Five in a row--reactions of smokers to tobacco tax increases: population-based cross-sectional studies in Germany 2001-2006
- PMID: 17297071
- PMCID: PMC2598446
- DOI: 10.1136/tc.2006.017236
Five in a row--reactions of smokers to tobacco tax increases: population-based cross-sectional studies in Germany 2001-2006
Abstract
Objective: To assess reactions of smokers to five waves of tobacco tax increases in Germany.
Design: A 10-wave cross-sectional study, with assessments before and after the tax increases.
Setting: General population of Germany.
Participants and methods: 10 representative samples from the general population with a total number of 27,608 people aged > or = 14 years, including 8548 smokers (31% of the total sample), were interviewed.
Outcome measures: Reflection on smoking behaviour, and smoking behaviour (quitting, reducing, switching to a cheaper brand or no change) before and after tobacco tax increases.
Results: Before the tax increases, one third to more than half of the smokers reflected on their smoking behaviour, 9.7-13.9% intended to quit, 23.4-34.7% intended to reduce smoking and 10.8-16.4% intended to switch to cheaper tobacco products, whereas 36.1-52.1% did not intend any change at all. After the tax increases, one fourth to more than one third reported to have reflected on their smoking behaviour, 4.0-7.9% quit smoking owing to the increase, 11.5-16.6% reduced consumption and 11.0-19.9% switched to cheaper products. Significant associations were found between the height of the price increase and the intentions and reactions of smokers.
Conclusions: Price increases lead to a substantial reflection on smoking and intended and realised behaviour changes such as reduced consumption and switching to cheaper tobacco products. These effects are more pronounced the more the price rises. Therefore, taxation policy will lead to quitting and reducing smoking. However, complementary measures should also be taken to prevent smokers switching to cheaper tobacco products, which would reduce the effectiveness of taxation policy.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Intended changes in smoking behaviour of Dutch young adults after an increase in excise tax: a cross-sectional survey.BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 28;13(12):e065535. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065535. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 38154901 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of tobacco tax increases and industry pricing on smoking behaviours and inequalities: a mixed-methods study.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Apr. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Apr. PMID: 32271515 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 25430738
-
Paying the price: a cross-sectional survey of Australian socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers' responses to hypothetical cigarette price rises.Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 Mar;33(2):177-85. doi: 10.1111/dar.12103. Epub 2013 Dec 18. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014. PMID: 24350887
-
Tobacco tax as a health protecting policy: a brief review of the New Zealand evidence.N Z Med J. 2005 Apr 15;118(1213):U1403. N Z Med J. 2005. PMID: 15843832 Review.
Cited by
-
[Smoke-free Germany 2040: a discussion paper].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2020 Sep;145(18):e101-e107. doi: 10.1055/a-1162-3305. Epub 2020 Jun 22. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2020. PMID: 32572868 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
Impact of tobacco control interventions on smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence: a systematic review.J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:961724. doi: 10.1155/2012/961724. Epub 2012 Jun 7. J Environ Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22719777 Free PMC article.
-
Association of a major tobacco tax increase in California with increased smoking cessation.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Sep 1;117(9):1883-1890. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf121. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025. PMID: 40570136 Free PMC article.
-
Sharp changes in tobacco products affordability and the dynamics of smoking prevalence in various social and income groups in Ukraine in 2008-2012.Tob Induc Dis. 2013 Oct 18;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-11-21. Tob Induc Dis. 2013. PMID: 24139099 Free PMC article.
-
Gender differences in the price elasticity of demand for waterpipe and cigarette smoking in Lebanon, Jordan and Palestine: a volumetric choice experiment.BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):e058495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058495. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35851023 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ezzati M, Lopez A D. Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000. Lancet 2003362847–852. - PubMed
-
- Chaloupka F J, Warner K E. The economics of smoking. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, eds. Handbook of health economics. Vol 1. North Holland,Elsevier 20001539–1627.
-
- Gallet C A, List J A. Cigarette demand: a meta‐analysis of elasticities. Health Econ 200312821–835. - PubMed
-
- Chaloupka F J. Macro‐social influences: the effects of prices and tobacco‐control policies on the demand for tobacco products. Nicotine Tob Res 19991(Suppl 1)S105–S109. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources