Death at a discount: how the tobacco industry thwarted tobacco control policies in US military commissaries
- PMID: 17297072
- PMCID: PMC2598443
- DOI: 10.1136/tc.2006.017350
Death at a discount: how the tobacco industry thwarted tobacco control policies in US military commissaries
Abstract
Background: The US military is perhaps the only retailer consistently losing money on tobacco. Military stores (commissaries and exchanges) have long sold discount-priced cigarettes, while the Department of Defense (DoD) pays directly for tobacco-related healthcare costs of many current and former customers. Tobacco use also impairs short-term troop readiness.
Objective: To examine the long struggle to raise commissary tobacco prices and the tobacco industry's role in this policy effort.
Methods: Analysis of internal tobacco industry documents, searches of government and military websites and newspaper databases, and interviews with key informants identified in the documents.
Results: Efforts to raise commissary tobacco prices began in the mid-1980s. Opposition quickly emerged. Some military officials viewed tobacco use as a "right" and low prices as a "benefit". Others raised issues of authority, and some saw the change as threatening the stores. The tobacco industry successfully exploited complex relationships among the Congress, the DoD, commissaries, exchanges and private industry, obstructing change for over a decade. Leadership from the Secretary and Assistant Secretaries of Defense, presidential support and procedural manoeuvring finally resulted in a modest price increase in 1996, but even then, high-level military officials were apparently threatened with retaliation from pro-tobacco Congressmen.
Conclusions: The longstanding military tradition of cheap cigarettes persists because of the politics of the military sales system, the perception within the military of tobacco use as a right, and tobacco industry pressures. Against its own best interests, the US military still makes tobacco available to service members at prices below those in the civilian sector.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: REM owns a share each of Philip Morris (Altria) and Reynolds American stock for research and advocacy purposes.
Similar articles
-
Cigarette prices in military retail: a review and proposal for advancing military health policy.Mil Med. 2013 May;178(5):563-9. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00517. Mil Med. 2013. PMID: 23756017 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Forcing the Navy to sell cigarettes on ships: how the tobacco industry and politicians torpedoed Navy tobacco control.Am J Public Health. 2011 Mar;101(3):404-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.196329. Epub 2011 Jan 13. Am J Public Health. 2011. PMID: 21233435 Free PMC article.
-
"They're going to die anyway": smoking shelters at veterans' facilities.Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):604-12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301022. Epub 2013 Feb 14. Am J Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23409899 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco Pricing in Military Stores: Views of Military Policy Leaders.Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Oct;18(10):2041-4. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw121. Epub 2016 May 4. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016. PMID: 27146639 Free PMC article.
-
Internet cigarette sales and Native American sovereignty: political and public health contexts.J Public Health Policy. 2012 May;33(2):173-87. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2012.4. Epub 2012 Feb 23. J Public Health Policy. 2012. PMID: 22358120 Review.
Cited by
-
Installation Tobacco Control Programs in the U.S. Military.Mil Med. 2016 Jun;181(6):596-601. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00313. Mil Med. 2016. PMID: 27244072 Free PMC article.
-
"It's not a priority when we're in combat": public health professionals and military tobacco control policy.Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):660-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302363. Epub 2015 Feb 25. Am J Public Health. 2015. PMID: 25713938 Free PMC article.
-
Helping smokers quit: understanding the barriers to utilization of smoking cessation services.Milbank Q. 2008 Dec;86(4):601-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00536.x. Milbank Q. 2008. PMID: 19120982 Free PMC article.
-
Testing antismoking messages for Air Force trainees.Tob Control. 2016 Nov;25(6):656-663. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052477. Epub 2015 Oct 19. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 26482786 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cigarette prices in military retail: a review and proposal for advancing military health policy.Mil Med. 2013 May;178(5):563-9. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00517. Mil Med. 2013. PMID: 23756017 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bray R M, Hourani L L, Rae K L, Dever J A, Brown J M, Vincus A A.et al 2002 Department of Defense survey of health related behaviors among military personnel. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; October 2003, Report No. : RTI/7841/006‐FR
-
- MacKay J, Eriksen M. The tobacco atlas. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002
-
- Conway T, Cronan T. Smoking, exercise, and physical fitness. Prev. Med. 199321723–734. - PubMed
-
- Zadoo V, Fengler S, Catterson M. The effects of alcohol and tobacco use on troop readiness. Mil. Med. 1993158(7)480–484. - PubMed
-
- Helyer A J, Brehm W T, Perino L. Economic consequences of tobacco use for the Department of Defense, 1995. Mil. Med. 1998163(4)217–221. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical