Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: part 2--Evaluation of system accuracy
- PMID: 17297375
- DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249257.16912.AA
Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: part 2--Evaluation of system accuracy
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of a novel bone-mounted miniature robotic system for percutaneous placement of pedicle and translaminar facet screws.
Methods: Thirty-five spinal levels in 10 cadavers were instrumented. Each cadaver's entire torso was scanned before the procedure. Surgeons planned optimal entry points and trajectories for screws on reconstructed three-dimensional virtual x-rays of each vertebra. Either a clamp or a minimally invasive external frame was attached to the bony anatomy. Anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic images using targeting devices were obtained and automatically registered with the virtual x-rays of each vertebra generated from the computed tomographic scan obtained before the procedure. A miniature robot was mounted onto the clamp and external frame and the system controlled the robot's motions to align the cannulated drill guide along the planned trajectory. A drill bit was introduced through the cannulated guide and a hole was drilled through the cortex. Then, K-wires were introduced and advanced through the same cannulated guide and left inside the cadaver. The cadavers were scanned with computed tomography after the procedure and the system's accuracy was evaluated in three planes, comparing K-wire positions with the preoperative plan. A total of fifty-five procedures were evaluated.
Results: Twenty-nine of 32 K-wires and all four screws were placed with less than 1.5 mm of deviation; average deviation was 0.87 +/- 0.63 mm (range, 0-1.7 mm) from the preoperative plan in this group. Sixteen of 19 K-wires were placed with less than 1.5 mm of deviation. There was one broken and one bent K-wire. Another K-wire was misplaced because of collision with the previously placed wire on the contralateral side of the same vertebra because of a mistake in planning, resulting in a 6.5-mm deviation. When this case was excluded, average deviation was 0.82 +/- 0.65 mm (range, 0-1.5 mm).
Conclusion: These results verify the system's accuracy and support its use for minimally invasive spine surgery in selected patients.
Similar articles
-
Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: Part I--Technical development and a test case result.Neurosurgery. 2006 Sep;59(3):641-50; discussion 641-50. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000229055.00829.5B. Neurosurgery. 2006. PMID: 16955046
-
Miniature robotic guidance for spine surgery--introduction of a novel system and analysis of challenges encountered during the clinical development phase at two spine centres.Int J Med Robot. 2006 Jun;2(2):146-53. doi: 10.1002/rcs.90. Int J Med Robot. 2006. PMID: 17520625 Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using a bone mounted miniature robotic system: first experiences and accuracy of screw placement.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):392-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318191ed32. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19214099
-
Assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy, procedure time, and radiation exposure using a miniature robotic guidance system.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Jul;25(5):241-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318218a5ef. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012. PMID: 21602728
-
Robotic-Assisted Spinal Surgery: Current Generation Instrumentation and New Applications.Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2020 Jan;31(1):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Oct 25. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2020. PMID: 31739920 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 May;100(6_sup):8-15. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp1.8. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018. PMID: 29717889 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of Robotic-Assisted Spinal Surgery-Comparison to TJR Robotics, da Vinci Robotics, and Optoelectronic Laboratory Robotics.Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(s2):S38-S55. doi: 10.14444/8139. Epub 2021 Oct 4. Int J Spine Surg. 2021. PMID: 34607917 Free PMC article.
-
Sensorless Based Haptic Feedback Integration In Robot-assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion For Lumbar Spine Surgery: A preliminary cadaveric study.Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 May 16;24:420-433. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.05.022. eCollection 2024 Dec. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024. PMID: 38841212 Free PMC article.
-
A Pilot Human Cadaveric Study on Accuracy of the Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation System for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Insertion Using a New Intraoperative Rapid Registration Method.J Digit Imaging. 2023 Aug;36(4):1919-1929. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00840-x. Epub 2023 May 2. J Digit Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37131064 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients.Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22(3):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2499-1. Epub 2012 Sep 14. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 22975723 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical