Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb 13:7:19.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-19.

Long-term trends in evolution of indels in protein sequences

Affiliations

Long-term trends in evolution of indels in protein sequences

Yuri Wolf et al. BMC Evol Biol. .

Abstract

Background: In this paper we describe an analysis of the size evolution of both protein domains and their indels, as inferred by changing sizes of whole domains or individual unaligned regions or "spacers". We studied relatively early evolutionary events and focused on protein domains which are conserved among various taxonomy groups.

Results: We found that more than one third of all domains have a statistically significant tendency to increase/decrease in size in evolution as judged from the overall domain size distribution as well as from the size distribution of individual spacers. Moreover, the fraction of domains and individual spacers increasing in size is almost twofold larger than the fraction decreasing in size.

Conclusion: We showed that the tolerance to insertion and deletion events depends on the domain's taxonomy span. Eukaryotic domains are depleted in insertions compared to the overall test set, namely, the number of spacers increasing in size is about the same as the number of spacers decreasing in size. On the other hand, ancient domain families show some bias towards insertions or spacers which grow in size in evolution. Domains from several Gene Ontology categories also demonstrate certain tendencies for insertion or deletion events as inferred from the analysis of spacer sizes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 7

References

    1. Chervitz SA, Aravind L, Sherlock G, Ball CA, Koonin EV, Dwight SS, Harris MA, Dolinski K, Mohr S, Smith T, Weng S, Cherry JM, Botstein D. Comparison of the complete protein sets of worm and yeast: orthology and divergence. Science. 1998;282:2022–2028. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aravind L, Dixit VM, Koonin EV. Apoptotic molecular machinery: vastly increased complexity in vertebrates revealed by genome comparisons. Science. 2001;291:1279–1284. - PubMed
    1. Kummerfeld SK, Teichmann SA. Relative rates of gene fusion and fission in multi-domain proteins. Trends Genet. 2005;21:25–30. - PubMed
    1. Zhang J. Protein-length distributions for the three domains of life. Trends Genet. 2000;16:107–109. - PubMed
    1. Liang P, Riley M. A comparative genomics approach for studying ancestral proteins and evolution. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2001;50:39–72. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources