Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Jul;91(7):898-900.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.113290. Epub 2007 Feb 14.

Sample size in studies on diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology: a literature survey

Frank Bochmann  1 , Zoe Johnson, Augusto Azuara-Blanco
Affiliations
Review

Sample size in studies on diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology: a literature survey

Frank Bochmann et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: To assess the sample sizes used in studies on diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology. Design and sources: A survey literature published in 2005.

Methods: The frequency of reporting calculations of sample sizes and the samples' sizes were extracted from the published literature. A manual search of five leading clinical journals in ophthalmology with the highest impact (Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Ophthalmology, Archives of Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and British Journal of Ophthalmology) was conducted by two independent investigators.

Results: A total of 1698 articles were identified, of which 40 studies were on diagnostic accuracy. One study reported that sample size was calculated before initiating the study. Another study reported consideration of sample size without calculation. The mean (SD) sample size of all diagnostic studies was 172.6 (218.9). The median prevalence of the target condition was 50.5%.

Conclusion: Only a few studies consider sample size in their methods. Inadequate sample sizes in diagnostic accuracy studies may result in misleading estimates of test accuracy. An improvement over the current standards on the design and reporting of diagnostic studies is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Bachman L, Puhan M, Riet G.et al Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey. BMJ 20063321127–1129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Irwig L, Bossuyt P M, Glasziou P.et al Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ 2002324669–671. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schulz K F, Grimes D A. Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical. Lancet 20053651348–1353. - PubMed
    1. Lijmer J G, Bossuyt P M, Heisterkamp S H. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic testes. Stat Med 2002211525–1537. - PubMed
    1. Flauhault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol 200558859–862. - PubMed