The impact of OSHA recordkeeping regulation changes on occupational injury and illness trends in the US: a time-series analysis
- PMID: 17303676
- PMCID: PMC2078472
- DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.029322
The impact of OSHA recordkeeping regulation changes on occupational injury and illness trends in the US: a time-series analysis
Abstract
Objectives: The Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII), based on Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) logs, indicates that the number of occupational injuries and illnesses in the US has steadily declined by 35.8% between 1992-2003. However, major changes to the OSHA recordkeeping standard occurred in 1995 and 2001. The authors assessed the relation between changes in OSHA recordkeeping regulations and the trend in occupational injuries and illnesses.
Methods: SOII data available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for years 1992-2003 were collected. The authors assessed time series data using join-point regression models.
Results: Before the first major recordkeeping change in 1995, injuries and illnesses declined annually by 0.5%. In the period 1995-2000 the slope declined by 3.1% annually (95% CI -3.7% to -2.5%), followed by another more precipitous decline occurring in 2001-2003 (-8.3%; 95% CI -10.0% to -6.6%). When stratifying the data, the authors continued to observe significant changes occurring in 1995 and 2001.
Conclusions: The substantial declines in the number of injuries and illnesses correspond directly with changes in OSHA recordkeeping rules. Changes in employment, productivity, OSHA enforcement activity and sampling error do not explain the large decline. Based on the baseline slope (join-point regression analysis, 1992-4), the authors expected a decline of 407 964 injuries and illnesses during the period of follow-up if no intervention occurred; they actually observed a decline of 2.4 million injuries and illnesses of which 2 million or 83% of the decline can be attributed to the change in the OSHA recordkeeping rules.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None.
Comment in
-
Are work-related conditions less common or were their definitions changed?Occup Environ Med. 2007 Jul;64(7):429-30. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.033241. Occup Environ Med. 2007. PMID: 17582085 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
OSHA recordkeeping: "how we got to this point".New Solut. 2008;18(4):493-7. doi: 10.2190/NS.18.4.f. New Solut. 2008. PMID: 19193536 No abstract available.
-
Employer knowledge of federal requirements for recording work-related injuries and illnesses: Implications for occupational injury surveillance data.Am J Ind Med. 2018 May;61(5):422-435. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22824. Epub 2018 Mar 11. Am J Ind Med. 2018. PMID: 29527706
-
Exploring the relationship between employer recordkeeping and underreporting in the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses.Am J Ind Med. 2014 Oct;57(10):1133-43. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22350. Epub 2014 Aug 5. Am J Ind Med. 2014. PMID: 25099477 Free PMC article.
-
Occupational health and safety regulation in the coal mining industry: public health at the workplace.Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:195-207. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.001211. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991. PMID: 1828671 Review.
-
Occupational fatalities, injuries, illnesses, and related economic loss in the wholesale and retail trade sector.Am J Ind Med. 2010 Jul;53(7):673-85. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20813. Am J Ind Med. 2010. PMID: 20213749 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of occupational injury prevention policies in Spain.Public Health Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug;124 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):180-7. doi: 10.1177/00333549091244S120. Public Health Rep. 2009. PMID: 19618820 Free PMC article.
-
Organisational factors and under-reporting of occupational injuries in Sweden: a population-based study using capture-recapture methodology.Occup Environ Med. 2021 Oct;78(10):745-752. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-107257. Epub 2021 Mar 31. Occup Environ Med. 2021. PMID: 33790030 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons learned from Ohio workers' compensation claims to mitigate hazards in the landscaping services industry.Am J Ind Med. 2021 Aug;64(8):699-713. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23261. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Am J Ind Med. 2021. PMID: 34076900 Free PMC article.
-
Using a severity threshold to improve occupational injury surveillance: Assessment of a severe traumatic injury-based occupational health indicator across the International Classification of Diseases lexicon transition.Am J Ind Med. 2024 Jan;67(1):18-30. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23545. Epub 2023 Oct 18. Am J Ind Med. 2024. PMID: 37850904 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of agricultural and occupational injuries by workers' compensation and other payer sources.Am J Ind Med. 2019 Nov;62(11):969-977. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23040. Epub 2019 Aug 22. Am J Ind Med. 2019. PMID: 31436863 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chao E L.Fatal occupational injuries in the United States, 1995–1999: a chartbook. Report 965. US Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2000
-
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA Statement. Statement of Secretary of Labor Alexis Heran on 1999 workplace injury and illness rates, 12 December 2000. Available at http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table = NEWS_RELEASES&p_id = 1371 (accessed April 2007)
-
- US Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Reporting occupational injury and illness data to OSHA; Final Rule. 29 CFR Part 1904. Docket no R‐02. US Department of Labor 1997
-
- Turk R A. OSHA cuts red tape on injury/illness reporting. Mater Manage Health Care 199766 - PubMed
-
- US Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Reporting occupational injury and illness data to OSHA; Final Rule. 29 CFR Part 1904. Docket no R‐02. Federal Register 2001665196–6135.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical