Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun 1;109(11):4980-7.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-11-056895. Epub 2007 Feb 15.

Comparative biodistributions of pretargeted radioimmunoconjugates targeting CD20, CD22, and DR molecules on human B-cell lymphomas

Affiliations

Comparative biodistributions of pretargeted radioimmunoconjugates targeting CD20, CD22, and DR molecules on human B-cell lymphomas

Anastasia Pantelias et al. Blood. .

Abstract

Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) using streptavidin (SA)-conjugated antibodies (Abs), followed by clearing agent and radiolabeled biotin is a promising method that can increase the effectiveness of RIT, while decreasing the toxicities associated with directly labeled Abs. Although CD20 has been the traditional target antigen for RIT of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), studies targeting HLA DR and CD22 have yielded promising results. Targeting all 3 antigens at once may further augment the effect of PRIT. This study compares the targeting of Ramos, Raji, and FL-18 lymphoma xenografts with either anti-CD20 Ab/SA (1F5/SA), anti-HLA DR Ab/SA (Lym-1/SA), anti-CD22 Ab/SA (HD39/SA), or all 3 conjugates in combination, followed 24 hours later by a biotin-N-acetyl-galactosamine clearing agent, and 3 hours after that by (111)In-DOTA-biotin. The Ab/SA conjugate yielding the best tumor uptake and tumor-to-normal organ ratios of radioactivity varied depending on the target antigen expression on the cell line used, with 1F5/SA and Lym-1/SA yielding the most promising results overall. Also, the best tumor-to-normal organ ratios of absorbed radioactivity were obtained using single conjugates optimized for target tumor antigen expression rather than the combination therapy. This study highlights the importance of screening the antigenic expression on lymphomas to select the optimal reagent for PRIT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cell-binding studies. Flow cytometric analysis of the cell-binding capabilities of 1F5/SA, Lym-1/SA, and HD39/SA to 3 different B lymphoma cell lines: Ramos (A), Raji (B), and FL-18 (C). For all studies, 2 controls were included, one omitting the primary conjugate and one using a nonbinding control conjugate HB8181/SA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pharmacokinetics and blood clearance of Ab/SA conjugates. (A) Whole blood clearance of 1.4 nmol of either 125I-labeled 1F5/SA (●), Lym-1/SA (○) or HD39/SA (◇) injected intravenously into athymic BALB/c mice (n = 4/group). (B-D) The effect of the NAGB CA on circulating levels of each of the Ab/SA conjugates: 1F5/SA (B), Lym-1/SA (C), and HD39/SA (D). Athymic BALB/c mice (n = 4/group) were injected intravenously at t = 0 with 1.4 nmol 125I-labeled conjugate followed 24 hours later with an intravenous injection of 5.8 nmol CA. In each study, serial blood samples were obtained from the retro-orbital venous plexus and radiation levels present determined by γ-counting and percent injected dose/gram (%ID/g) calculated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Biodistributions of 111In-DOTA-biotin in tumor xenografts and normal organs after pretargeting with each Ab/SA conjugate. Athymic BALB/c mice bearing Ramos, Raji, or FL-18 tumor xenografts were injected intravenously with 1.4 nmol of a single conjugate. After 24 hours, mice were injected with 5.8 nmol CA followed 3 hours later with 1.2 nmol 111In-labeled DOTA-biotin. Mice were killed 24 and 48 hours later and blood, tumors, and normal organs were harvested, weighed, and analyzed for levels of radioactivity by γ-counting to determine %ID/g. Results are shown for PRIT with 1F5/SA (A), Lym-1 (B), HD39/SA (C), and the nonbinding control conjugate HB8181/SA (D). For each organ, the first bar represents results 24 hours after 111In-DOTA-biotin injection and the second bar represents results after 48 hours.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparative biodistributions using all 3 conjugates in combination or with each conjugate singly at 24 hours. For the combination studies, mice bearing Ramos (A), Raji (B), or FL-18 (C) tumor xenografts were injected intravenously with a cocktail of either 0.47 or 1.4 nmol each of 1F5/SA, Lym-1/SA, and HD39/SA followed 24 hours later with 5.8 or 17.4 nmol, respectively, of CA and 3 hours after that with 1.2 nmol 111In-DOTA-biotin. Mice were killed 24 and 48 hours after injection of 111In-DOTA-biotin and tumor and organs were harvested and analyzed as for the studies in Figure 3. Each graph shows %ID/g 24 hours after injecting 1.4 nmol 1F5/SA alone (□), Lym-1/SA alone (▩), HD39 alone (■), and all 3 used in combination at 0.47 nmol/conjugate (▤) and at 1.4 nmol/conjugate (▧).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparative biodistributions using all 3 conjugates in combination or with each conjugate singly at 48 hours. Combination studies in Ramos (A), Raji (B), and FL-18 (C) as described for Figure 4. Each graph shows results 48 hours after injecting 111In-DOTA-biotin pretargeted with either 1.4 nmol 1F5/SA alone (□), Lym-1/SA alone (▩), HD39 alone (■), and all 3 used in combination at 0.47 nmol/conjugate (▤) and at 1.4 nmol/conjugate (▧).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Tumor-to–normal organ ratios of absorbed radioactivity using each Ab/SA conjugate individually or all 3 in combination. Mice were treated as described in Figure 3. Tumor-to–normal organ ratios of radioactivity are shown 48 hours after injection of 111In-DOTA-biotin. Animals were pretargeted with 1.4 nmol of either 1F5/SA (□), Lym-1/SA (▩), or HD39/SA (■) or a combination of either 0.47 nmol (▤) or 1.4 nmol of each conjugate (▧). Results are shown for mice bearing Ramos (A), Raji (B), and FL-18 (C) xenografts.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kaminski MS, Zelenetz AD, Press OW, et al. Pivotal study of iodine I 131 tositumomab for chemotherapy-refractory low-grade or transformed low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3918–3928. - PubMed
    1. Kaminski MS, Radford JA, Gregory SA, et al. Re-treatment with I-131 tositumomab in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who had previously responded to I-131 tositumomab. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7985–7993. - PubMed
    1. Wiseman GA, Witzig TE. Yttrium-90 (90Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) induces long-term durable responses in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2005;20:185–188. - PubMed
    1. Witzig TE, Flinn IW, Gordon LI, et al. Treatment with ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy in patients with rituximab-refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3262–3269. - PubMed
    1. Witzig TE, Gordon LI, Cabanillas F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of yttrium-90-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy versus rituximab immunotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade, follicular, or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2453–2463. - PubMed

Publication types