Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006;23(4):533-42.
doi: 10.1385/MO:23:4:533.

Predictive value of prognostic indices in patients with follicular lymphomas

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Predictive value of prognostic indices in patients with follicular lymphomas

M Radojkovic et al. Med Oncol. 2006.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare which of three indices--International Prognostic Index (IPI), Italian Lymphoma Intergroup (ILI) index, Follicular Lymphoma adapted International Prognostic Index (FLIPI)--is the most useful in predicting outcome in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients and to identify other clinical and laboratory prognostic factors that influence survival.

Patients and methods: Clinical and prognostic studies were carried out in 99 patients with FL.

Results: The distribution of patients in IPI risk groups was 44.4%, 19.2%, and 36.4% of cases classified as low, intermediate, and high risk. According to ILI, low-, intermediate-, and high-risk scores were present in 34.3%; 27.3%, and 38.4% of FL patients. After applying the FLIPI index, the patients were divided into three risk groups: low (21.2% of cases), intermediate (39.4%), and high (39.4%) of FL patients. Survival curves demonstrated a high significant difference for the low- and high-risk group according to IPI and FLIPI (log rank=91.13 and 82.17 respectively; p < 0.0001). Difference in overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) among low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups according to ILI was statistically significant (log rank test p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: All three indices are important tools for prognostic evaluation of FL patients, as well as useful in identifying FL patients with poor outcome. IPI and FLIPI classify patients into two risk groups (low/intermediate- and high-risk groups) with significance difference in OS and FFS, but ILI is more reliable in stratifying patients in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14 ):987-94 - PubMed
    1. Blood. 2000 Feb 1;95(3):783-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1244 - PubMed
    1. Biometrics. 1973 Sep;29(3):579-84 - PubMed
    1. Int J Hematol. 2001 Apr;73(3):363-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources