Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns
- PMID: 17307313
- DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.01.001
Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns
Abstract
Background: Hearing loss (HL) is likely to be the most common congenital abnormality in humans, with a reported prevalence of 1 to 3 per 1000 live births. Early detection and intervention is critical to prevent the adverse consequences of a delayed diagnosis on speech, language and cognitive development. As 33-50% of all congenital HLs cannot be detected in a selective hearing risk, use of universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) programs is expanding.
Aims: We tested the value of a UNHS protocol, based on a two-stage strategy of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAEs) in all infants, followed by diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing in those infants who did not meet TEOAE pass criteria and those infants at high risk for hearing loss.
Methods: TEOAES (292 DP Echoport OAE Analyzer) served as the initial screen, followed by diagnostic ABR (Amplaid MK12) in newborns that did not meet pass criteria for TEOAEs. Additionally, all infants at high audiologic risk according to the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing received a diagnostic ABR evaluation. Of 21,125 total live births, 19,700 were tested (April 1, 1998-July 31, 2006). Accuracy of the UNHS strategy in predicting congenital HL was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
Results: Prevalence for all HLs in the neonatal period was 1.78/1000 l.b. (35/19,700), with bilateral HL in 1.42/1000 l.b. (28/19,700) [low risk rate: 0.43/1000 l.b. (8/18,356); high risk infants rate: 14.88/1000 l.b. (20/1344)]. All the HL infants were diagnosed <3 and received intervention <6 months age. ROC curves results showed 100% sensitivity (95% C.I.: 89.0-100) and 99.3% specificity (95% C.I.: 99.2-99.4) of the two-stage strategy in detecting congenital HLs [area under the ROC curve: 0.997 (95% C.I.: 0.995-0.997)].
Conclusions: (1) The epidemiology of congenital HLs widely justifies UNHS; (2) a two-stage TEOAE and diagnostic ABR screening for congenital HL is feasible, minimally invasive and accurate in the early detection of congenital HL; and (3) a congenital HL screening strategy based exclusively on the use of TEOAEs should always consider the possibility of false negative cases.
Similar articles
-
A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):663-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1688. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 16140706
-
Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Apr;73(4):607-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Jan 31. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009. PMID: 19185924
-
Newborn hearing screening: a regional example for national care.Ir Med J. 2010 May;103(5):146-9. Ir Med J. 2010. PMID: 20666087
-
[A new method for detecting congenital hearing disorders. Infants are screened by measuring otoacoustic emissions].Lakartidningen. 1999 Mar 10;96(10):1166-8. Lakartidningen. 1999. PMID: 10193119 Review. Swedish.
-
[Permanent hearing loss in the prelingual phase in children with a non-aberrant neonatal hearing screening result].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Feb 23;152(8):426-30. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008. PMID: 18361190 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Hearing screening outcomes in pediatric critical care survivors: a 1-year report.Acute Crit Care. 2022 May;37(2):209-216. doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.00899. Epub 2022 Mar 8. Acute Crit Care. 2022. PMID: 35280037 Free PMC article.
-
Early detection of hearing loss.GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;7:Doc05. Epub 2010 Oct 7. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008. PMID: 22073092 Free PMC article.
-
Transient Evoked and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in a Group of Neonates.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jul;19(3):255-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546431. Epub 2015 Mar 2. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 26157501 Free PMC article.
-
Performance and characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Campania region (Italy) between 2013 and 2019.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Mar;279(3):1221-1231. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06748-y. Epub 2021 Mar 25. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 33768315 Free PMC article.
-
Universal newborn hearing screening, a revolutionary diagnosis of deafness: real benefits and limitations.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Oct;268(10):1399-406. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1672-1. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011. PMID: 21698417 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous