Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr;23(4):331-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00383-007-1878-x. Epub 2007 Feb 17.

Phimosis and topical steroids: new clinical findings

Affiliations
Free article

Phimosis and topical steroids: new clinical findings

Nicola Zampieri et al. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Phimosis has been defined as unretractable foreskin without adherences and/or a circular band of tight prepuce preventing full retraction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy (response rate) of topical steroids for the treatment of tight phimosis at different age stages. After using the same medication with different dosage schemes, a retrospective analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy of topical steroids in the treatment of tight phimosis. Patients were divided into three groups: group A (betamethasone scheme A), group B (betamethasone scheme B) and group C (control group). Remission of phimosis, with a complete exposure and without a narrowing behind the glans, was considered a complete response to treatment. The outcomes were then related to dosage scheme and patient's age. The dosage for group A was more effective than the dosage for groups B and C (control group). Phimosis resolved in 90% (group A), 72% (group B) and 56% (group C) of cases. A successful treatment was closely related to the age of patients at the beginning of steroid application. The results showed that treatment with topical steroids, which in general gives good results, proved to be much more successful in patients aged between 4 and 8 years, suggesting the efficacy of an early beginning of the treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br Med J. 1949 Dec 24;2(4642):1433-7, illust - PubMed
    1. Prog Urol. 2002 Dec;12(6):1268-71 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(1):47-58 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1106-8 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 2):1746-7; discussion 1747 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources