What gets measured gets done: assessing data availability for adolescent populations
- PMID: 17308967
- DOI: 10.1007/s10995-007-0179-2
What gets measured gets done: assessing data availability for adolescent populations
Abstract
Objectives: To identify specific adolescent sub-populations; to evaluate the health data available regarding these populations related to 21 key national adolescent health objectives from Healthy People 2010; and to make recommendations for improving data capacity to further efforts to reduce health disparities among adolescents.
Methods: Adolescent populations were identified through a consensus process. Academic and government literature was extensively reviewed using internet search techniques to identify available national data for each of these populations on each key national health objective.
Results: 18 adolescent subpopulations were identified. These populations fit into four overlapping categories defined by demography, legal status, chronic health condition, or other special characteristics. Overall, national, population-based data regarding these sub-populations were located for 36% of the 21 health objectives. Within the sub-populations, most data was available for ethnic/racial groups, with 57-81% of each of the objectives having data. Data regarding rural/urban groups were found for about one-half of the 21 objectives, and data were located on all other groups for one-fourth or fewer of the objectives. Within the objectives, substance abuse objectives were the most widely measured, with data available for 56-78% of the various populations. For some objectives, such as drug-or alcohol-related motor vehicle deaths depression among the developmentally disabled, no national data were found.
Conclusions: There are still too little data available regarding the specific health status or health objectives for different adolescent populations. A national adolescent data-priority agenda is needed to develop strategies to improve health data regarding adolescent sub-populations. Federal and state health monitoring agencies could create national health profiles of different populations, include more population markers in health studies, and develop tools for population-specific health assessment, particularly for those within the government's care, including incarcerated and foster care youth.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Adolescent Pregnancy Guidelines.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Aug;37(8):740-756. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30180-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26474231
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Narrowing the gap in childhood immunization disparities.Pediatr Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;31(5):380-6. Pediatr Nurs. 2005. PMID: 16295153 Review.
-
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x. Obes Rev. 2006. PMID: 16371076 Review.
Cited by
-
Availability of state-based obesity surveillance data on high school students with disabilities in the United States.Matern Child Health J. 2015 May;19(5):1152-61. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1616-7. Matern Child Health J. 2015. PMID: 25303806
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources