Neural modulation by stimulation
- PMID: 17309708
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2006.00057.x
Neural modulation by stimulation
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of neuropathic pain is supported by good-quality randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective case studies, and observational case series that confirm its efficacy and safety. SCS has been successfully used in various refractory neuropathic pain conditions, including failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), neuropathic back and leg pain, and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II. According to the Harbour and Miller Scale (2001), the evidence for SCS in FBSS has been classified as grade B, while that for CRPS type I has been classified as grade A. Clinical evidence has shown that compared to conventional pain therapy, more than two-thirds of carefully selected patients treated with SCS achieved sustained pain relief of 50% or more, with minimal side effects. Many patients were able to reduce their analgesic consumption. Quality of life improved and the majority of patients were happy with their treatment; in some cases, patients were able to return to work. Trial stimulation, which is relatively inexpensive and completely reversible, provides predictive value for long-term efficacy and increases the cost-effectiveness of permanent implantation. Studies consistently report that over time, SCS is potentially cost saving to the healthcare system. At present, SCS is considered a "last resort" in the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain, yet evidence suggests that early intervention with SCS results in greater efficacy and, in the case of FBSS, should be considered before re-operation.
Similar articles
-
Neurostimulation for chronic neuropathic back pain in failed back surgery syndrome.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Apr;31(4 Suppl):S25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.12.012. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006. PMID: 16647592 Review.
-
Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.Pain. 2007 Nov;132(1-2):179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.028. Epub 2007 Sep 12. Pain. 2007. PMID: 17845835 Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation.Neurosurgery. 2008 Oct;63(4):762-70; discussion 770. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325731.46702.D9. Neurosurgery. 2008. PMID: 18981888 Clinical Trial.
-
Demographic characteristics of patients with severe neuropathic pain secondary to failed back surgery syndrome.Pain Pract. 2009 May-Jun;9(3):206-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00276.x. Epub 2009 Mar 5. Pain Pract. 2009. PMID: 19281499 Clinical Trial.
-
Spinal cord stimulation.Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Jul-Aug;71(7-8):471-4. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005. PMID: 16012421 Review.
Cited by
-
Phantom breast syndrome.Indian J Palliat Care. 2009 Jul;15(2):103-7. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.58453. Indian J Palliat Care. 2009. PMID: 20668586 Free PMC article.
-
Effective treatments for pain in the older patient.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011 Feb;15(1):22-34. doi: 10.1007/s11916-010-0164-0. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011. PMID: 21128021 Review.
-
Incidence and Resolution Strategies for Early-Onset Postoperative Leg Pain Following Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):978-987. doi: 10.14444/8128. Epub 2021 Sep 22. Int J Spine Surg. 2021. PMID: 34551924 Free PMC article.
-
Selective distant electrostimulation by synchronized bipolar nanosecond pulses.Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 11;9(1):13116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49664-2. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31511591 Free PMC article.
-
Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Surgery.Asian Spine J. 2017 Aug;11(4):642-652. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.642. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Asian Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28874984 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical