Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1992 Feb;72(1):143-55.
doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45632-x.

Operative assessment of intestinal viability

Affiliations
Review

Operative assessment of intestinal viability

P G Horgan et al. Surg Clin North Am. 1992 Feb.

Abstract

Acute intestinal ischemia and infarction remain serious clinical problems despite early operative intervention. Accurate intraoperative assessment of intestinal viability is essential in determining the limits of resection in patients with intestinal infarction. Clinical features of bowel viability such as color and peristalsis do not correlate uniformly with bowel survival, and as a result, several techniques have been developed to assess intestinal blood flow at the time of operation. The requirements of an ideal viability test are: 1. The technique must have ready availability, preferably in every operating theater dealing with abdominal emergencies. 2. The necessary equipment must not be cumbersome or require specialized personnel. 3. The method must be accurate with a minimum of false-negative results and, more importantly, few false positives. A false-negative results leaves in situ nonviable bowel, which may lead to early perforation and late stricturing. This situation may be recoverable with further surgical intervention, however. On the other hand, a false-positive assessment of bowel viability results in the resection of potentially recoverable intestine, which is lost forever and may represent a vital difference for morbidity-mortality and long-term nutrition. 4. The technique must be objective and be reproducible. 5. The method must be cost effective. To date, only two tests have found widespread acceptance and clinical applicability: fluorescein assessment and Doppler studies either with ultrasound or as refined in laser velocimetry. Although other techniques may be of some value today or in the future, the most practical approach would appear to be to use fluorescein assessment under a modified Wood's lamp as the initial method of evaluating intestinal viability and either Doppler ultrasound or perfusion fluorometry for any areas of particularly doubtful viability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources