Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey
- PMID: 17316936
- DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.09.001
Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey
Abstract
Objective: to investigate the knowledge and attitudes towards Down's syndrome screening among pregnant women presenting for prenatal screening in Greece, in order to explore whether Greek women are able to make informed choices.
Design: survey using self-administered questionnaires.
Setting: public hospital in Athens, Greece.
Participants: 135 pregnant women with a gestational age of between 11 and 20 weeks, just before antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.
Findings: a total of 96% of women had a positive attitude towards screening and 45% had a good level of knowledge concerning the screening process for Down's syndrome. A standard measure of informed choice was used, which was validated for use in Greek. We found that 44% of women made an informed choice and 56% of women made an uninformed choice. This was because of the low percentage of women with a good level of knowledge. It was also found that knowledge and attitudes were not associated and seemed to be independent of each other. A higher level of informed choice was associated with a higher level of educational achievement and income, time of decision-making and the satisfaction with the decision.
Conclusions: health professionals should ensure that all women receive appropriate and intelligible information about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. This information should be suited to women's learning ability in order to increase their knowledge before undergoing screening. Health professionals should educate and increase women's knowledge, and also give women a chance to explore their attitudes and discuss the issues involved.
Implications for practice: on the basis of the current measure of informed choice, we found that knowledge is a weak determinant of uptake of screening. However, the measure focuses on knowledge regarding the screening process, rather than on the condition itself. In addition, informed choice is a far broader concept than the issues covered by the measurement tool. Therefore, it could be concluded that attempts to increase attitude-behaviour consistency (i.e. to increase uptake for women with positive attitudes towards screening and to decrease uptake for women with negative attitudes) could be more successful in increasing informed choice in screening for Down's syndrome in Greece.
Similar articles
-
Routinisation and constraints on informed choice in a one-stop clinic offering first trimester chromosomal antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Oct 13. Midwifery. 2011. PMID: 20947230
-
Audiovisual information affects informed choice and experience of information in antenatal Down syndrome screening--a randomized controlled trial.Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):390-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Jul 31. Patient Educ Couns. 2012. PMID: 21807474 Clinical Trial.
-
The provision of information and informed decision-making on prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a questionnaire- and register-based survey in a non-selected population.Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jun;87(3):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 24. Patient Educ Couns. 2012. PMID: 22030253
-
Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(12):1420-5. doi: 10.1080/00016340600985198. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006. PMID: 17260215 Review.
-
Informed consent: attitudes, knowledge and information concerning prenatal examinations.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(12):1414-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340600985164. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006. PMID: 17260214 Review.
Cited by
-
NIPT and Informed Consent: an Assessment of Patient Understanding of a Negative NIPT Result.J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):1127-37. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9945-x. Epub 2016 Apr 1. J Genet Couns. 2016. PMID: 27038428
-
Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2050-4. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30340550 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study.PLoS One. 2021 Jan 27;16(1):e0245938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245938. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33503072 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a fragile X syndrome (FXS) knowledge scale: towards a modified multidimensional measure of informed choice for FXS population carrier screening.Health Expect. 2015 Feb;18(1):69-80. doi: 10.1111/hex.12009. Epub 2012 Oct 15. Health Expect. 2015. PMID: 23067225 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan;23(1):8-21. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.89. Epub 2014 May 21. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015. PMID: 24848746 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical