Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption
- PMID: 17318044
- DOI: 10.1097/01.sle.0000213756.76761.b7
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication offers clear benefits for our patients, but requires advanced laparoscopic skills. Robotic assistance in laparoscopic antireflux surgery improves dexterity skills and shortens learning curve, possibly leading to faster, more precise, and safer laparoscopic surgery.
Methods: We review our first 11 cases of robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication using the 4-armed daVinci surgical system, comparing them with patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the same period.
Results: Robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication did not result in more complications. However, the use of robotic assistance took an extra-47 minutes to complete the operation and costs were raised with an accessory euro 987.47.
Conclusions: The use of robotic assistance in laparoscopic antireflux surgery is safe and feasible, but results in longer operating time and higher costs compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery without proven benefit at this moment.
Similar articles
-
Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.Br J Surg. 2006 May;93(5):553-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5325. Br J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16552744 Clinical Trial.
-
Intraoperative and postoperative outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.Eur Surg Res. 2009;43(2):198-203. doi: 10.1159/000223751. Epub 2009 Jun 10. Eur Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 19521090
-
Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Jun;17(3):171-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007. PMID: 17581459
-
[Robotic fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease].Chir Ital. 2004 May-Jun;56(3):321-31. Chir Ital. 2004. PMID: 15287628 Review. Italian.
-
Pediatric robotic surgery: early assessment.Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):1642-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3822. Epub 2009 Nov 16. Pediatrics. 2009. PMID: 19917586 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotics versus laparoscopy--an experimental study of the transfer effect in maiden users.Ann Surg Innov Res. 2010 Apr 6;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-4-3. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2010. PMID: 20370924 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time.Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Nov;50(11):1825-30. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9017-2. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007. PMID: 17690936 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of robotic assisted laparoscopic recurrent paraesophageal hernia repair: insights from a large single institution experience.Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2560-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07291-y. Epub 2019 Dec 6. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31811451
-
Comparison of hospital charges between robotic, laparoscopic stapled, and laparoscopic handsewn Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.J Robot Surg. 2009 Jun;3(2):75-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0143-9. Epub 2009 May 29. J Robot Surg. 2009. PMID: 27638218
-
Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Apr;400(3):283-92. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1278-y. Epub 2015 Feb 18. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. PMID: 25854502 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources