Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;16(4):493-504.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9085-9. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

Knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing: a two year follow-up study in patients with asthma, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease

Hiske Calsbeek  1 , Mattijn Morren, Jozien Bensing, Mieke Rijken
Affiliations

Knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing: a two year follow-up study in patients with asthma, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease

Hiske Calsbeek et al. J Genet Couns. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Adequate knowledge and personal attitudes towards DNA-testing are major determinants of optimal utilization of genetic testing. This study aims to (1) assess the genetic knowledge and attitude towards genetic testing of patients with asthma, diabetes mellitus type II and cardiovascular diseases, (2) determine whether their knowledge or attitude changed since 2002, and (3) investigate the predictive role of knowledge on attitude. Data were collected within the Panel of Patients with Chronic Diseases in 2002 and 2004, resulting in 398 data-pairs. Results show that factual knowledge mainly relates to associations between genes and diseases, less is known on associations between genes, chromosomes, cells and body. The perceived knowledge on DNA-testing has not increased since 2002. The attitude towards genetic testing also appeared to be rather consistent. Less perceived medical genetic knowledge and more perceived social genetic knowledge were found predictive for a more reserved attitude towards genetic testing. In conclusion, advanced developments in the field of genetics are not accompanied by increased knowledge of patients with common multi-factorial diseases. The finding that more perceived social genetic knowledge results in more reluctance can be considered an indicator for the necessity of social debates on genetic testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Distribution of patients with asthma, diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) considering their illness as hereditary.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Berth H., Balck F., Dinkel A. Attitudes towards genetic testing in patients at risk for HNPCC/FAP and the German population. Genet Testing. 2002;4:273–280. doi: 10.1089/10906570260471804. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Capelli M., Surh L., Humphreys L., Verma S., Logan D., Hunter A., Allanson J. Psychological and social determinants of women’s decisions to undergo genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer. Clin Genet. 1999;55:419–430. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.1999.550605.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Capelli M., Surh L., Walker M., Korneluk Y., Humphreys L., Verma S., Hunter A., Allanson J., Logan D. Psychological and social predictors of decisions about genetic testing for breast cancer in high-risk women. Psychol Health Med. 2001;6:321–333. doi: 10.1080/13548500123484. - DOI
    1. Hall E. The ‘Geneticisation’ of heart disease: A network analysis of the production of new genetic knowledge. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:2673–2683. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henneman L., Timmermans D. R. M., Van Der Wal G. Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information. Community Genet. 2004;7:33–43. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms