Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Aug;17(8):2028-37.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0584-3. Epub 2007 Feb 22.

Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT

Affiliations
Review

Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT

Jean-François Paul et al. Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Because cardiac computed tomography (CT) (mainly coronary CT angiography) is a very promising technique, used more and more for coronary artery evaluation, the benefits and risks of this new low-invasive technique must be balanced. Radiation dose is a major concern for coronary CT angiography, especially in case of repeated examinations or in particular subgroups of patients (for example young female patients). Radiation dose to patient tends to increase from 16- to 64-slice CT. Radiation exposure in ECG-gated acquisitions may reach up to 40 mSv; considerable differences are attributable to the performance of CT machines, to technical dose-sparing tools, but also to radiological habits. Setting radiation dose at the lowest level possible should be a constant goal for the radiologist. Current technological tools are detailed in regard to their efficiency. Optimisation is necessary, by a judicious use of technological tools and also by individual adaptation of kV or mAs. This paper reviews the different current strategies for radiation dose reduction, keeping image quality constant. Data from the literature are discussed, and future technological developments are considered in regards to radiation dose reduction. The particular case of paediatric patients with congenital heart disease is also addressed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 2;47(9):1840-5 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2006 Aug;16(8):1841-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):256-68 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2005 Oct 11;112(15):2318-23 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2005 Feb;15(2):334-41 - PubMed

MeSH terms