Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Feb 23:7:25.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-25.

Comparing health system performance assessment and management approaches in the Netherlands and Ontario, Canada

Ali R Tawfik-Shukor  1 , Niek S Klazinga, Onyebuchi A Arah
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing health system performance assessment and management approaches in the Netherlands and Ontario, Canada

Ali R Tawfik-Shukor et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Erratum in

  • BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:44

Abstract

Background: Given the proliferation and the growing complexity of performance measurement initiatives in many health systems, the Netherlands and Ontario, Canada expressed interests in cross-national comparisons in an effort to promote knowledge transfer and best practise. To support this cross-national learning, a study was undertaken to compare health system performance approaches in The Netherlands with Ontario, Canada.

Methods: We explored the performance assessment framework and system of each constituency, the embeddedness of performance data in management and policy processes, and the interrelationships between the frameworks. Methods used included analysing governmental strategic planning and policy documents, literature and internet searches, comparative descriptive tables, and schematics. Data collection and analysis took place in Ontario and The Netherlands. A workshop to validate and discuss the findings was conducted in Toronto, adding important insights to the study.

Results: Both Ontario and The Netherlands conceive health system performance within supportive frameworks. However they differ in their assessment approaches. Ontario's Scorecard links performance measurement with strategy, aimed at health system integration. The Dutch Health Care Performance Report (Zorgbalans) does not explicitly link performance with strategy, and focuses on the technical quality of healthcare by measuring dimensions of quality, access, and cost against healthcare needs. A backbone 'five diamond' framework maps both frameworks and articulates the interrelations and overlap between their goals, themes, dimensions and indicators. The workshop yielded more contextual insights and further validated the comparative values of each constituency's performance assessment system.

Conclusion: To compare the health system performance approaches between The Netherlands and Ontario, Canada, several important conceptual and contextual issues must be addressed, before even attempting any future content comparisons and benchmarking. Such issues would lend relevant interpretational credibility to international comparative assessments of the two health systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual Framework for Dutch National Health System Performance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ontario Health System Strategy Map.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Harmonized Five-Diamond Framework.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Incorporating Strategy into the Harmonized Five-Diamond Framework.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Greenberg A, Angus H, Sullivan T, Brown AD. Development of a set of strategy-based system-level cancer care performance indicators in Ontario, Canada. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:107–114. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg M, Meijerink Y, Gras M, Goossensen A, Schellekens W, Haeck J, Kallewaard M, Kingma H. Feasibility first: developing public performance indicators on patient safety and clinical effectiveness for Dutch hospitals. Health Policy. 2005;75:59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.02.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ten Asbroek AH, Arah OA, Geelhoed J, Custers T, Delnoij DM, Klazinga NS. Developing a national performance indicator framework for the Dutch health system. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16:65–71. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Veillard J. Developing Ontario's Health System Performance Measurement Scorecard. Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Health Results Team; 2006.
    1. Kelley E, Hurst J. Health Care Quality Indicators Project Conceptual Framework Paper. OECD Health Working Paper No. 23. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2006.

Publication types