Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 May;66(2):188-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

Informing smokers on additives in cigarettes: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Informing smokers on additives in cigarettes: a randomized trial

Jean-François Etter. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 May.

Abstract

Objective: To test the acceptability and impact of a booklet on chemical additives in cigarettes.

Methods: In 2005, 2152 current (59%), former (38%), and never (3%) smokers were enrolled on the Internet and randomly assigned to an intervention group which immediately received a 48-page booklet on cigarette additives by postal mail (n=1074), or to a control group (n=1078). Four weeks later, 1965 people (91%) answered an online follow-up questionnaire on knowledge on additives and motivation to quit smoking. Participants lived in France, Belgium, and Switzerland.

Results: Most participants in the intervention group agreed with: "What I learned in this booklet is outrageous" (74%) and "alarming" (71%). Most daily smokers agreed with: "This booklet makes me want to quit smoking" (52%). The booklet increased correct answers to affirmations such as: "Additives increase the impact of nicotine" (intervention: 83% "true", control: 61% "true", p<0.001) and: "Additives mask the smell and visibility of second-hand smoke" (74% versus 23%, p<0.001). The booklet had no impact on motivation to quit, smoking cessation rates and relapse rates.

Conclusions: The booklet was appreciated, caused vivid reactions and enhanced knowledge on additives. It had, however, no impact on smoking behavior, but this was not its primary objective.

Practice implications: More intensive education campaigns on cigarette additives are necessary and will be appreciated by the public.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources