Spasticity experience domains in persons with spinal cord injury
- PMID: 17321818
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.029
Spasticity experience domains in persons with spinal cord injury
Abstract
Objective: To understand the everyday life experiences of persons who have spasticity associated with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Design: Applied ethnographic design.
Setting: Patients' homes and rehabilitation clinics.
Participants: Twenty-four people with SCI who experience spasticity.
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: Domains identified through qualitative analysis of in-depth open-ended interviews.
Results: Domain analysis revealed 7 domains: physical, activity, emotional, economic, interpersonal, management, and cognitive. Descriptive subcategories within each domain were identified. Patients personalized the meaning of spasticity and expressed their understandings of the condition in ways that may not be consistent with clinical definitions. Some patients suggested that being able to control spasticity was preferable to total suppression.
Conclusions: Spasticity-related interventions need to be aimed at what matters most to the patient. It is critical for clinicians to understand patients' experiences to make accurate assessments, effectively evaluate treatment interventions, and select appropriate management strategies. When providers reconfigure patients' descriptions to fit neatly with a biomedical understanding of spasticity without carefully assessing the descriptions in terms of what matters most to patients, a potential risk for misappropriating interventions may arise.
Similar articles
-
Relationship between self- and clinically rated spasticity in spinal cord injury.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.312. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006. PMID: 16401432
-
The spinal cord injury spasticity evaluation tool: development and evaluation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Sep;88(9):1185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.012. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007. PMID: 17826466
-
A database of self-reported secondary medical problems among VA spinal cord injury patients: its role in clinical care and management.J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 Jan-Feb;39(1):53-61. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002. PMID: 11926327
-
A clinical overview of treatment decisions in the management of spasticity.Muscle Nerve Suppl. 1997;6:S14-20. Muscle Nerve Suppl. 1997. PMID: 9826980 Review.
-
Pain management in a patient with intractable spinal cord injury pain: a case report and literature review.Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1462-73, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000282804.25682.0f. Anesth Analg. 2007. PMID: 17959984 Review.
Cited by
-
Training-Specific Neural Plasticity in Spinal Reflexes after Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.Neural Plast. 2016;2016:6718763. doi: 10.1155/2016/6718763. Epub 2016 Sep 20. Neural Plast. 2016. PMID: 27725887 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Transcutaneous spinal stimulation in patients with intrathecal baclofen pump delivery system: A preliminary safety study.Front Neurosci. 2022 Dec 21;16:1075293. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1075293. eCollection 2022. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36620445 Free PMC article.
-
Cannabis health survey on usage in women with spinal cord injury and knowledge among physicians: A cross-sectional study.J Spinal Cord Med. 2023 Mar;46(2):291-297. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2038049. Epub 2022 Mar 29. J Spinal Cord Med. 2023. PMID: 35349394 Free PMC article.
-
Démythifier la spasticité en première ligne.Can Fam Physician. 2019 Oct;65(10):e422-e428. Can Fam Physician. 2019. PMID: 31604751 Free PMC article. French.
-
Clinical efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in patients with traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, or multiple sclerosis: An observational longitudinal study.Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 6;14:1133390. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1133390. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37090974 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical