Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;116(1):155-65.
doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.155.

Longitudinal evidence that psychopathy scores in early adolescence predict adult psychopathy

Affiliations

Longitudinal evidence that psychopathy scores in early adolescence predict adult psychopathy

Donald R Lynam et al. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

This study examined the relation between psychopathy assessed at age 13 by using the mother-reported Childhood Psychopathy Scale (D. R. Lynam, 1997) and psychopathy assessed at age 24 by using the interviewer-rated Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV; S. D. Hart, D. N. Cox, & R. D. Hare, 1995). Data from over 250 participants of the middle sample of the Pittsburgh Youth Study were used to examine this relation; approximately 9% of the sample met criteria for a possible PCL:SV diagnosis. Despite the long time lag, different sources, and different methods, psychopathy from early adolescence into young adulthood was moderately stable (r=.31). The relation was present for the PCL:SV total and facet scores, was not moderated by initial risk status or initial psychopathy level, and held even after controlling for other age 13 variables. Diagnostic stability was somewhat lower. Both specificity and negative predictive power were good, and sensitivity was adequate, but positive predictive power was poor. This constitutes the first demonstration of the relative stability of psychopathy from adolescence into adulthood and provides evidence for the incremental utility of the adolescent psychopathy construct. Implications and future directions are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alterman AI, Cacciola JS, Rutherford MJ. Reliability of the Revised Psychopathy Checklist in substance abuse patients. Psychological Assessment. 1993;5:442–448.
    1. Blair RJR, Coles M. Expression recognition and behavioural problems in early adolescence. Cognitive Development. 2001;15:421–434.
    1. Brinkley C, Schmitt W, Smith S, Newman J. Construct validation of a self-report psychopathy scale: Does Levenson’s self-report psychopathy scale measure the same constructs as Hare’s psychopathy checklist-revised? Personality and Individual Differences. 2001;31:1021–1038.
    1. Caspi A. Personality development across the life course. In: Damon W, Eisenberg N, editors. Handbook of child psychology, Volume 3: Social, emotional, and personality development. New York: Wiley; 1997. pp. 311–388.
    1. Cleckley H. The mask of sanity: an attempt to reinterpret the so-called psychopathic personality. Oxford, England: Mosby; 1941.

Publication types