Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):460.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39070.573032.80. Epub 2007 Feb 26.

Effect of insulating existing houses on health inequality: cluster randomised study in the community

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of insulating existing houses on health inequality: cluster randomised study in the community

Philippa Howden-Chapman et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether insulating existing houses increases indoor temperatures and improves occupants' health and wellbeing.

Design: Community based, cluster, single blinded randomised study.

Setting: Seven low income communities in New Zealand.

Participants: 1350 households containing 4407 participants.

Intervention: Installation of a standard retrofit insulation package.

Main outcome measures: Indoor temperature and relative humidity, energy consumption, self reported health, wheezing, days off school and work, visits to general practitioners, and admissions to hospital.

Results: Insulation was associated with a small increase in bedroom temperatures during the winter (0.5 degrees C) and decreased relative humidity (-2.3%), despite energy consumption in insulated houses being 81% of that in uninsulated houses. Bedroom temperatures were below 10 degrees C for 1.7 fewer hours each day in insulated homes than in uninsulated ones. These changes were associated with reduced odds in the insulated homes of fair or poor self rated health (adjusted odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.68), self reports of wheezing in the past three months (0.57, 0.47 to 0.70), self reports of children taking a day off school (0.49, 0.31 to 0.80), and self reports of adults taking a day off work (0.62, 0.46 to 0.83). Visits to general practitioners were less often reported by occupants of insulated homes (0.73, 0.62 to 0.87). Hospital admissions for respiratory conditions were also reduced (0.53, 0.22 to 1.29), but this reduction was not statistically significant (P=0.16).

Conclusion: Insulating existing houses led to a significantly warmer, drier indoor environment and resulted in improved self rated health, self reported wheezing, days off school and work, and visits to general practitioners as well as a trend for fewer hospital admissions for respiratory conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Flow of households through trial
None
Fig 2 Bedroom temperatures in houses from intervention and control groups. The area under the frequency curves is proportional to the average number of hours each day below 10°C

Comment in

  • Housing and health.
    Thomson H, Petticrew M. Thomson H, et al. BMJ. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):434-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39133.558380.BE. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17332538 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
    1. Krieger J, Higgins D. Housing and health: time again for public health action. Am J Public Health 2002;92:758-68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oakley A. Experimentation and social interventions: a forgotten but important history. BMJ 1998;317:1239-42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomson H, Hoskins R, Petticrew M, Ogilvie D, Craig N, Quinn T, et al. Evaluating the health effects of social interventions. BMJ 2004;328:282-5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomson H, Petticrew M, Morrison D. Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies. BMJ 2001;323:187-90. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types