Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Mar;61(3):226-31.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.047001.

Elective surgery for aortic abdominal aneurysm: comparison of English outcomes with those elsewhere

Affiliations
Review

Elective surgery for aortic abdominal aneurysm: comparison of English outcomes with those elsewhere

Miodrag Filipovic et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to quantify mortality after elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in England, and to compare English case fatality rates (CFRs) with those reported in the literature.

Patients and methods: English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) for the financial years 1998/9 to 2001/2, linked to death data, were analysed. A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify studies reporting CFRs after elective AAA surgery. The CFR in England was compared with these studies by using confidence intervals on the CFRs and funnel plot techniques.

Results: In the English study, elective repair of AAA was performed on 11,338 patients of whom 771 died within 30 days after surgery (6.8%). The literature search found 66 studies: 34 reported mortality rates that were within the 99% confidence limits of the English rates, 31 below, and one study above.

Discussion: The CFR after elective surgical repair in England within 30 days of operation (6.8%) was higher than expected from the literature. Differences between England and other countries in quality of care is one possible explanation for the findings, but other explanations are possible and are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Isselbacher E M. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation 2005111816–828. - PubMed
    1. Filipovic M, Goldacre M J, Roberts S E.et al Trends in mortality and hospital admission rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm in England and Wales, 1979–1999. Br J Surg 200592968–975. - PubMed
    1. Ashton H A, Buxton M J, Day N E.et al The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 20023601531–1539. - PubMed
    1. Semmens J B, Norman P E, Lawrence‐Brown M M.et al Influence of gender on outcome from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 200087191–194. - PubMed
    1. Dueck A D, Johnston K W, Alter D.et al Predictors of repair and effect of gender on treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 200439784–787. - PubMed