This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comparative Study

. 1992 Feb 13;326(7):482-4.

doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260709.

Low-osmolality contrast agents--who needs them?

J W Hirshfeld Jr

PMID: 1732775
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260709

Comparative Study

Low-osmolality contrast agents--who needs them?

J W Hirshfeld Jr. N Engl J Med. 1992.

. 1992 Feb 13;326(7):482-4.

doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260709.

Author

J W Hirshfeld Jr

PMID: 1732775
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260709

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR, Gopalan R, Davidoff AJ, Litt M, Graziano S, Brinker JA. Steinberg EP, et al. N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 13;326(7):425-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260701. N Engl J Med. 1992. PMID: 1732769 Clinical Trial.
A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS, Vavasour HM, O'Dea F, Kent G, Stone E. Barrett BJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 13;326(7):431-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260702. N Engl J Med. 1992. PMID: 1732770 Clinical Trial.

Similar articles

High-osmolality and low-osmolality contrast agents.
Paulin S. Paulin S. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 16;327(3):202-3; author reply 204-5. N Engl J Med. 1992. PMID: 1608418 No abstract available.
High-osmolality and low-osmolality contrast agents.
Parfrey PS, Barrett BJ. Parfrey PS, et al. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 16;327(3):204-5. N Engl J Med. 1992. PMID: 1608421 No abstract available.
Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR, Gopalan R, Davidoff AJ, Litt M, Graziano S, Brinker JA. Steinberg EP, et al. N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 13;326(7):425-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260701. N Engl J Med. 1992. PMID: 1732769 Clinical Trial.
Clinical and economic factors in the selection of low-osmolality contrast media.
Matthai WH. Matthai WH. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Mar;5(3):188-97. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199405030-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994. PMID: 10146894 Review.
Selective use of radiographic low-osmolality contrast media in the 1990s.
Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Sonnad SS, Cohan NS. Ellis JH, et al. Radiology. 1996 Aug;200(2):297-311. doi: 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685315. Radiology. 1996. PMID: 8685315 Review. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Drug effects on the electrocardiogram. A review of their clinical importance.
Symanski JD, Gettes LS. Symanski JD, et al. Drugs. 1993 Aug;46(2):219-48. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199346020-00002. Drugs. 1993. PMID: 7691513 Review.
The choice of contrast media: medical, ethical and legal considerations.
Roy DJ, Dickens BM, McGregor M. Roy DJ, et al. CMAJ. 1992 Nov 1;147(9):1321-4. CMAJ. 1992. PMID: 1483235 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Selective use of low-osmolality contrast media in computed tomography.
Valls C, Andía E, Sánchez A, Moreno V. Valls C, et al. Eur Radiol. 2003 Aug;13(8):2000-5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1190-4. Epub 2001 Dec 13. Eur Radiol. 2003. PMID: 12942301

Publication types

Actions
Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Substances

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Atypon
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.