The effects of list-method directed forgetting on recognition memory
- PMID: 17328381
- PMCID: PMC3041022
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03194005
The effects of list-method directed forgetting on recognition memory
Abstract
It is an almost universally accepted claim that the list-method procedure of inducing directed forgetting does not affect recognition. However, previous studies have omitted a critical comparison in reaching this conclusion. This article reports evidence that recognition of material learned after cue presentation is superior for conditions in which the material that preceded cue presentation was designated as to-be-forgotten. Because the absence of an effect of directed-forgetting instructions on recognition is the linchpin of the theoretical claim that retrieval inhibition and not selective rehearsal underlies that effect, the present results call into question the need to postulate a role for inhibition in directed forgetting.
Figures


References
-
- Basden BH, Basden DR, Gargano GJ. Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 1993;19:603–616.
-
- Benjamin AS. On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 2001;27:941–947. - PubMed
-
- Benjamin AS, Bjork RA. On the relationship between recognition speed and accuracy for words rehearsed via rote versus elaborative rehearsal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 2000;26:638–648. - PubMed
-
- Benjamin AS, Craik FIM. Parallel effects of aging and time pressure on memory for source: Evidence from the spacing effect. Memory & Cognition. 2001;29:691–697. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous