Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Feb 28:8:21.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-21.

Low back pain education and short term quality of life: a randomized trial

Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian  1 , Ahmadreza Jamshidi, Kazem Mohammad, Ali Montazeri
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Low back pain education and short term quality of life: a randomized trial

Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Different interventions can reduce the burden of the chronic low back pain. One example is the use of a 'Back School Programme'. This is a brief therapy that uses a health education method to empower participants through a procedure of assessment, education and skill development. This study aimed to evaluate to what extent the programme could improve quality of life in those who suffer from the condition.

Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. One-hundred and two female patients with low back pain (n = 102) were randomly allocated into two groups, matched in terms of age, weight, education, socioeconomic status, occupation and some aspects of risk behavior. Group 1 (back school group, n = 50) but not group 2 (clinic group, n = 52) received the 'Back School Programme'. Then quality of life using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was assessed at two time points: at baseline and at three months follow-up. The findings were compared both within and between two groups.

Results: The 'Back School Programme' was effective in improving patients' quality of life; significant differences were found on all eight subscales of the SF-36 for group 1. In the clinic group (group 2), improvement was observed on three scales (bodily pain, vitality and mental health) but these improvements were less than in group 1. The mean improvement over all eight subscales of the SF-36 was significantly better for the 'Back School Programme' group.

Conclusion: The 'Back School Programme' is an effective intervention and might improve the quality of life over a period of 3 months in patients who experience chronic low back pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. MacDonald MJ, Sorock GS, Volinn E, Hashemi L, Clancy EA, Webster B. A descriptive study of recurrent low back pain claims. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39:35–43. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199701000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health status and health policy: quality of Life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
    1. Claiborne N, Vandenburgh H, Krause TM, Leung P. Measuring quality of life changes in individuals with chronic low back conditions: a back education programme evaluation. Evaluation and Programme Planning. 2002;25:61–70. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7189(01)00049-0. - DOI
    1. Lonn JH, Glomsrod B, Soukup MG, Bo K, Larsen S. Active back school: prophylactic management for low back pain: a randomized controlled 1-year follow-up study. Spine. 1999;24:865–871. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199905010-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turk DC, Dworkin RH. What should be the core outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials? Arthritis Res Ther. 2004;6:151–154. doi: 10.1186/ar1196. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources