Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):521.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39097.582639.55. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study

Affiliations

Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study

Marilyn Kendall et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To understand key challenges in researching end of life issues and identify ways of overcoming these.

Design: Qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with researchers and focus groups with people affected by cancer.

Participants: An international sample of 32 researchers; seven patients with experience of cancer; and four carers in south east Scotland.

Results: Researchers highlighted the difficulty of defining the end of life, overprotective gatekeeping by ethics committees and clinical staff, the need to factor in high attrition rates associated with deterioration or death, and managing the emotions of participants and research staff. People affected by cancer and researchers suggested that many people nearing the end of life do want to be offered the chance to participate in research, provided it is conducted sensitively. Although such research can be demanding, most researchers believed it to be no more problematic than many other areas of research and that the challenges identified can be overcome.

Conclusions: The continuing taboos around death and dying act as barriers to the commissioning and conduct of end of life research. Some people facing death, however, may want to participate in research and should be allowed to do so. Ethics committees and clinical staff must balance understandable concern about non-maleficence with the right of people with advanced illness to participate in research. Despite the inherent difficulties, end of life research can be conducted with ethical and methodological rigour. Adequate psychological support must be provided for participants, researchers, and transcribers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

  • Researching a good death.
    Workman S. Workman S. BMJ. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):485-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39141.417454.80. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17347190 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Clark J. Patient centred death. BMJ 2003;327:174-5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowling A. Research on dying is scant. BMJ 2000;320:1205. - PubMed
    1. Riley J, Ross JR. Research into care at the end of life. Lancet 2005;365:735-7. - PubMed
    1. Addington-Hall J. Research sensitivities to palliative care patients. Eur J Cancer Care 2002;11:220-4. - PubMed
    1. Entwistle V, Tritter J, Calnan M. Researching experiences of cancer: the importance of methodology. Eur J Cancer Care 2002;11:232-7. - PubMed

Publication types