Prognostic factors for uterine cancer in reproductive-aged women
- PMID: 17329517
- DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255980.88205.15
Prognostic factors for uterine cancer in reproductive-aged women
Abstract
Objective: To determine the prognostic factors that influence the survival of younger women diagnosed with uterine cancer.
Methods: Demographic and clinico-pathologic data were collected from the National Cancer Institute database between 1988 and 2001. Data were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: Of the 51,471 women diagnosed with uterine cancer in the study period, 2,076 (4.0%) patients were aged 40 years or younger, and 49,395 (96.0%) were older than 40. The mean age in the younger group was 35.6 years, compared with 65.2 years of the older group. The overall distribution by stage was stage I 75.4%, II 8.1%, III 6.7%, and IV 9.8%. Younger patients were more likely to be nonwhite (42.4% versus 18.3%, P<.001) and have stage I disease (79.2% versus 75.3%, P<.001), grade 1 lesions (47.6% versus 35.6%, P<.001), and sarcomas (15.9% versus 8.2%, P<.001) compared with their older counterparts. The overall 5-year disease-specific survival for younger patients was significantly better than that of older women (93.2% versus 86.4%, P<.001). On multivariable analysis, younger age, earlier stage, lower grade, nonblack race, endometrioid histology, and surgical treatment remained as significant independent prognostic factors for improved survival.
Conclusion: This large population-based study demonstrates that patients 40 years and younger have an overall survival advantage compared with women older than 40 years, independent of other clinico-pathologic prognosticators.
Level of evidence: III.
Similar articles
-
Age-specific survival of women with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus.Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Oct;79(1):86-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5934. Gynecol Oncol. 2000. PMID: 11006037
-
Uterine carcinosarcomas and grade 3 endometrioid cancers: evidence for distinct tumor behavior.Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;112(1):64-70. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318176157c. Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18591309
-
Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers.Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jun;109(3):370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 18. Gynecol Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18395777
-
Adjuvant radiotherapy in incompletely staged IC and II endometrioid uterine cancer.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;110(6):1237-43. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000292084.34534.c0. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 18055715
-
Multivariate prognostic study on large gastric cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2007 Jul 1;96(1):14-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20631. J Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17582596 Review.
Cited by
-
Endometrial carcinoma in a 14-year-old: A case report.Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2019 May 16;29:7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2019.05.006. eCollection 2019 Aug. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31193481 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility Sparing Treatment of Endometrial Cancer with and without Initial Infiltration of Myometrium: A Single Center Experience.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 29;12(12):3571. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123571. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33260382 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review Protocol.Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2717-2731. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01693-y. Epub 2021 Apr 8. Adv Ther. 2021. PMID: 33830463
-
Preoperative markers for the prediction of high-risk features in endometrial cancer.World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun 24;11(6):378-388. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i6.378. World J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32874951 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility-Sparing Approaches in Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 25;23(5):2531. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052531. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35269674 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials