Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: a 82Rb PET/CT study
- PMID: 17332611
Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: a 82Rb PET/CT study
Abstract
Our aim was to determine the value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reserve (stress ejection fraction - rest ejection fraction) in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the anatomic extent of underlying severe coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods: We studied 510 consecutive patients with suspected CAD undergoing gated rest and vasodilator stress (82)Rb PET/CT. Patients were categorized as having no perfusion abnormalities, mild, moderate, or severe reversible perfusion defects. In a subgroup of 68 patients with coronary angiography, patients were categorized as having 0-vessel, 1-vessel, 2-vessel, or left main/3-vessel disease.
Results: Patients without coronary risk factors who comprised our control group as well as patients with coronary risk factors and normal perfusion demonstrated a high LVEF reserve (7% +/- 7% and 5% +/- 6%, respectively). The mean LVEF reserve was negative (-0.2% +/- 8%) in patients with severe reversible defects and in patients with 3-vessel (-6% +/- 8%) and left main (-8% +/- 5%) disease. Among the clinical and scintigraphic variables studied, male sex, rest ejection fraction, and increasing magnitude of myocardium at risk predicted a lower LVEF reserve, whereas LVEF reserve was the only independent predictor of left main/3-vessel disease (P = 0.008). An LVEF reserve of more than +5% had a positive predictive value of only 41% but a negative predictive value of 97% for excluding severe left main/3-vessel CAD.
Conclusion: During (82)Rb PET/CT, LVEF increases with vasodilator stress in patients without significant stress-induced perfusion defects or severe left main/3-vessel CAD. A high LVEF reserve appears to be an excellent tool to exclude left main/3-vessel CAD noninvasively.
Comment in
-
Positron emission tomography for perfusion and function.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008 Feb;10(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s11886-008-0009-1. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008. PMID: 18417000 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Detection of obstructive coronary artery disease using regadenoson stress and 82Rb PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Med. 2013 Oct;54(10):1748-54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.120063. Epub 2013 Aug 12. J Nucl Med. 2013. PMID: 23940305 Free PMC article.
-
Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jul;2(7):846-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.04.009. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009. PMID: 19608135 Free PMC article.
-
Left ventricular ejection fraction, myocardial blood flow and hemodynamic variables in adenosine and regadenoson vasodilator 82-Rubidium PET.J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Jun;29(3):921-933. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02729-0. Epub 2021 Aug 13. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 34386864
-
[Role of perfusion myocardial scintigraphy with gated SPECT technique in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with chronic coronary disease].Ital Heart J Suppl. 2002 Mar;3(3):309-18. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2002. PMID: 12040846 Review. Italian.
-
Assessment of myocardial perfusion and function with PET and PET/CT.J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Jun;17(3):498-513. doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9223-5. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20379862 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
High-risk coronary artery disease, but normal myocardial perfusion: A matter of concern?J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):542-5. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0167-7. Epub 2015 May 21. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 25995183 No abstract available.
-
Recent advances in cardiac PET and PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):962-9. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9142-5. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19756909 Review. No abstract available.
-
Present and future of clinical cardiovascular PET imaging in Europe--a position statement by the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Sep;35(9):1709-24. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0859-1. Epub 2008 Jun 26. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008. PMID: 18581113 Review.
-
The significance of post-stress decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients undergoing regadenoson stress gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Aug;25(4):1313-1323. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0802-6. Epub 2017 Feb 8. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 28181156
-
Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease?J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):670-80. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9506-5. Epub 2012 Mar 14. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22415819
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous