[Survival with distant metastatic disease in head and neck cancer. A retrospective analysis]
- PMID: 17333044
- DOI: 10.1007/s00106-006-1522-4
[Survival with distant metastatic disease in head and neck cancer. A retrospective analysis]
Abstract
Questions: The objective of this retrospective analysis was to investigate parameters with a potential impact on survival in a collective of 114 patients with distant metastatic disease after head and neck cancer.
Patients and methods: The primary endpoint was the survival with distant metastatic disease, the secondary endpoint was overall survival. Primary therapy, local recurrence, second neoplasms, palliative chemotherapy (CHT) and radiotherapy (RT), as well as Karnofsky performance status (KPS) at the time of diagnosis of the metastases were analyzed as potential impact parameters using the log-rank test with subsequent Cox regression analysis.
Results: Palliative CHT (P=0.0020) and KPS (P=0.0011) had a significant positive impact on the median survival probability with metastases (8.2 months) using the log-rank test, KPS at the time of diagnosis of metastases remained as an independent prognostic parameter in the Cox regression (P=0.0013). Primary therapy, local tumor control and KPS had a significant positive influence on the median overall survival probability (18.5 months) univariately (P=0.0139, P=0.0106, P= 0.0096) and multivariately (P=0.0123, and P=0.0063, P=0.0197, respectively).
Conclusions: KPS at the time of diagnosis of metastases is an independent prognostic parameter for both endpoints. Lacking evidence for life prolongation, palliative therapies should therefore first and foremost focus on the stabilization of the KPS.
Similar articles
-
Factors affecting survival in 37 consecutive patients undergoing de novo stereotactic radiosurgery for contiguous sites of vertebral body metastasis from renal cell carcinoma.J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jan;22(1):52-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE1482. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 25360530
-
[The prognostic value of time parameters in adjuvant radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. A retrospective analysis of 138 patients].Strahlenther Onkol. 2005 Dec;181(12):800-7; discussion 808-9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-005-1449-9. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005. PMID: 16362791 German.
-
Survival After Distant Metastasis in Head and Neck Cancer.Anticancer Res. 2015 Oct;35(10):5499-502. Anticancer Res. 2015. PMID: 26408715
-
The prognostic value of anaemia at different treatment times in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007 May;19(4):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.02.009. Epub 2007 Mar 12. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007. PMID: 17433968
-
Analysis of radiation therapy for the control of Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck based on 36 cases and a literature review.Ear Nose Throat J. 2008 Nov;87(11):634-43. Ear Nose Throat J. 2008. PMID: 19006065 Review.
Cited by
-
The crucial role of SEMA3F in suppressing the progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma.Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2017 Dec 28;22:32. doi: 10.1186/s11658-017-0064-y. eCollection 2017. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2017. PMID: 29299034 Free PMC article.
-
Survival of patients with head and neck cancer. Impact of physical status and comorbidities.Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Jan;188(1):62-70. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-0009-8. Epub 2011 Dec 23. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012. PMID: 22189439
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical