Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May;59(6):749-57.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0329-z. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

Imexon-based combination chemotherapy in A375 human melanoma and RPMI 8226 human myeloma cell lines

Affiliations

Imexon-based combination chemotherapy in A375 human melanoma and RPMI 8226 human myeloma cell lines

Julie Scott et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007 May.

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the cytotoxic effects of imexon (NSC-714597) in tumor cells when combined with a broad panel of chemotherapeutic drugs.

Methods: The sulforhodamine B (SRB) and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cytotoxicity assays were used to analyze the degree of growth inhibition for the combination studies in the A375 human malignant melanoma and RPMI 8226 human multiple myeloma cell lines, respectively. Cells were continuously exposed to both drugs at a constant molar ratio for 4-5 days. Combination effects were analyzed using the Median Effect method. Statistical significance was inferred if the 95% confidence interval for the combination interaction (C.I.) values for a particular two-drug combination did not include 1.0 (additivity). Synergy was inferred for C.I. values<1.0 and antagonism for CI values>1.0.

Results: Imexon was synergistic when combined with DNA-binding agents (cisplatin, dacarbazine, melphalan) and pyrimidine-based antimetabolites (cytarabine, fluorouracil, gemcitabine) in both cell lines. Antagonistic combinations with imexon included methotrexate and the topoisomerase I (TOPO I) and II (TOPO II) inhibitors irinotecan, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone and etoposide. Docetaxel was synergistic with imexon in both cell lines whereas paclitaxel and fludarabine showed a mixed result. Dexamethasone and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib showed synergy in myeloma cells and additivity in the melanoma cells. The vinca alkaloid, vinorelbine, and the multi-targeted antifol, pemetrexed, were additive with imexon in both cell lines.

Discussion: The consistent synergy seen for imexon and alkylating agents may relate to the sulfhydryl-lowering effect of imexon, which would render cells more sensitive to electrophilic species from the alkylators. The marked synergy noted with pyrimidine-based antimetabolites was unexpected and may relate to the induction of cell cycle arrest in S-phase. The strong antagonism noted for imexon with topoisomerase I and II inhibitors may be due to the effect of imexon at increasing oxidant levels which are known to antagonize the cytotoxic effects of topoisomerase poisons. In contrast, the synergy seen with bortezomib in myeloma cells may be related to an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) from both drugs. These results suggest that combinations of imexon with alkylating agents and pyrimidine-based antimetabolites are rational to pursue in therapeutic studies in vivo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Combination indices of representative DNA-binding agents with imexon. The mean combination indexes (logarithmic y-axis) are plotted versus the fraction of cells effected (% of control growth, x-axis), for DNA-binding agents combined with imexon in RPMI 8226 multiple myeloma cells (closed symbols) and in A375 malignant melanoma cells (open symbols). The vertical bars indicate one standard deviation for the combinations of imexon with: a cisplatin, b dacarbazine, c melphalan and d mitomycin. The horizontal bar at 1.0 indicates the line of simple additivity
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Combination indices of antimetabolites with imexon. The mean combination indexes (logarithmic y-axis) are plotted versus the fraction of cells effected (% of control growth, x-axis), for pyrimidine-based antimetabolites combined with imexon in RPMI 8226 multiple myeloma cells (closed symbols) and in A375 malignant melanoma cells (open symbols). The vertical bars indicate one standard deviation for the combinations of imexon with: a cytarabine, b fludarabine, c gemcitabine and d fluorouracil
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Combination indices of topoisomerase inhibitors with imexon. The mean combination indexes (logarithmic y-axis) are plotted versus the fraction of cells effected (% of control growth, x-axis), for agents that were antagonist when combined with imexon in RPMI 8226 multiple myeloma cells (closed symbols) and in A375 malignant melanoma cells (open symbols). The vertical bars indicate one standard deviation for the combinations of imexon with: a methotrexate, b irinotecan, c doxorubicin and d etoposide

References

    1. Adel AL, Dorr RT, Liddil JD. The effect of anticancer drug sequence in experimental combination chemotherapy. Cancer Investig. 1993;11:15. - PubMed
    1. Andrews PA, Murphy MP, Howell SB. Characterization of cisplatin resistance in COLO 316 human ovarian carcinoma cells. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989;25:619. - PubMed
    1. Arrick BA, Nathan CF. Glutathione metabolism as a determinant of therapeutic eYcacy: a review. Cancer Res. 1984;44:4224. - PubMed
    1. Bedford P, Walker MC, Sharma HL, Perera A, McAuliffe CA, Masters J, Hill BT. Factors influencing the sensitivity of two human bladder carcinoma cell lines to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) Chem Biol Interact. 1987;61:1. - PubMed
    1. Behrens BC, Hamilton TC, Masuda H, Grotzinger KR, Whang-Peng J, et al. Characterization of a cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) resistant human ovarian cancer cell line and its use in evaluation of platinum analogues. Cancer Res. 1987;47:414. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances