Analysis of possible interactions of an attentional task with cochlear micromechanics
- PMID: 1733917
- DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90156-h
Analysis of possible interactions of an attentional task with cochlear micromechanics
Abstract
Several contradictory studies have been published regarding the effect of selective attention on cochlear mechanics, possibly modulated through efferent pathways. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions have been proposed as a highly sensitive tool for testing the hypothesis of such a modulation. In this study, two other types of evoked otoacoustic emissions (i.e. distortion products and stimulus frequency emissions between 1 and 4 kHz) were measured on 20 normal subjects in absence and presence of a visual selective attention task. The duration of measurements at a given frequency was short enough to eliminate possible artefacts due to long-time averaging. No significant change was observed in these signals, considered as probes of cochlear micromechanics. It is concluded that in this set of experimental conditions, selective attention has a negligible effect on peripheral sensitivity.
Similar articles
-
[Effects of selective attention on distortion product otoacoustic emissions].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1997 Dec;11(12):543-5. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1997. PMID: 10323024 Chinese.
-
Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.Neurosci Lett. 2014 Jan 24;559:132-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.11.059. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Neurosci Lett. 2014. PMID: 24333175
-
[Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2001 Dec;36(6):436-40. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2001. PMID: 12761959 Chinese.
-
Attention and otoacoustic emissions: a review.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1994 Summer;18(2):215-22. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(94)90026-4. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1994. PMID: 8058214 Review.
-
Function and plasticity of the medial olivocochlear system in musicians: a review.Hear Res. 2014 Feb;308:27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 30. Hear Res. 2014. PMID: 23994434 Review.
Cited by
-
Otoacoustic Emissions Evoked by the Time-Varying Harmonic Structure of Speech.eNeuro. 2021 Apr 13;8(2):ENEURO.0428-20.2021. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0428-20.2021. Print 2021 Mar-Apr. eNeuro. 2021. PMID: 33632811 Free PMC article.
-
Heightened visual attention does not affect inner ear function as measured by otoacoustic emissions.PeerJ. 2017 Dec 21;5:e4199. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4199. eCollection 2017. PeerJ. 2017. PMID: 29302404 Free PMC article.
-
No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Aug;146(2):1475. doi: 10.1121/1.5123391. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019. PMID: 31472524 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive task demands modulate the sensitivity of the human cochlea.Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 13;3:30. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00030. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22347870 Free PMC article.
-
Oscillatory infrasonic modulation of the cochlear amplifier by selective attention.PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0208939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208939. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30615632 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources