Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jun;20(2):114-21.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9028-5.

Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology

Håkan Geijer  1 , Mats Geijer, Lillemor Forsberg, Susanne Kheddache, Patrik Sund
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology

Håkan Geijer et al. J Digit Imaging. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

In diagnostic radiology, medical-grade monochrome displays are usually recommended because of their higher luminance. Standard color displays can be used as a less expensive alternative, but have a lower luminance. The aim of the present study was to compare image quality for these two types of displays. Images of a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom were read by four radiologists using a 2-megapixel (MP) color display (143 cd/m(2) maximum luminance) as well as 2-MP (295 cd/m(2)) and 3-MP monochrome displays. Thirty lumbar spine radiographs were also read by four radiologists using the color and the 2-MP monochrome display in a visual grading analysis (VGA). Very small differences were found between the displays when reading the CDRAD images. The VGA scores were -0.28 for the color and -0.25 for the monochrome display (p = 0.24; NS). It thus seems possible to use color displays in diagnostic radiology provided that grayscale adjustment is used.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Calibration curves for the 2-MP color and 2-MP monochrome displays. JND = Just noticeable difference.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Image quality figures for a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom. Lower IQF values indicate better image quality. i) Comparison of a 2-MP color and a 2-MP monochrome display using a flat-panel detector image at low ambient illumination (23 lx). ii) Comparison of the same displays and image at higher ambient illumination (90 lx). iii) Comparison of the same displays using a storage phosphor plate image with lower inherent image quality at 23 lx. iv) Comparison of the 2-MP color display and a 3-MP monochrome display with no zoom allowed at 23 lx.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Reiner B, Siegel E, Hooper F, Ghebrekidan H, Warner J, Briscoe B, Protopapas Z, Pomerantz S. Variation of monitor luminance on radiologist productivity in the interpretation of skeletal radiographs using a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging. 1997;10:176. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krupinski EA, Johnson J, Roehrig H, Nafziger J, Fan J, Lubin J. Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images. J Digit Imaging. 2004;17:258–263. doi: 10.1007/s10278-004-1016-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langer S, Bartholmai B, Fetterly K, Harmsen S, Ryan W, Erickson B, Andriole K, Carrino J. SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: comparing the efficacy of 5-MP CRT versus 3-MP LCD in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. J Digit Imaging. 2004;17:149–157. doi: 10.1007/s10278-004-1013-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Commission of the European Communities: European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, EUR 16260, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1996
    1. Pärtan G, Mayrhofer R, Urban M, Wassipaul M, Pichler L, Hruby W. Diagnostic performance of liquid crystal and cathode-ray-tube monitors in brain computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2397–2401. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1822-y. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types