Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar 26;96(6):875-81.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603662. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

The research priorities of patients attending UK cancer treatment centres: findings from a modified nominal group study

Affiliations

The research priorities of patients attending UK cancer treatment centres: findings from a modified nominal group study

J Corner et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Members of the public are increasingly consulted over health care and research priorities. Patient involvement in determining cancer research priorities, however, has remained underdeveloped. This paper presents the findings of the first consultation to be conducted with UK cancer patients concerning research priorities. The study adopted a participatory approach using a collaborative model that sought joint ownership of the study with people affected by cancer. An exploratory, qualitative approach was used. Consultation groups were the main method, combining focus group and nominal group techniques. Seventeen groups were held with a total of 105 patients broadly representative of the UK cancer population. Fifteen areas for research were identified. Top priority areas included the impact cancer has on life, how to live with cancer and related support issues; risk factors and causes of cancer; early detection and prevention. Although biological and treatment related aspects of science were identified as important, patients rated the management of practical, social and emotional issues as a higher priority. There is a mismatch between the research priorities identified by participants and the current UK research portfolio. Current research activity should be broadened to reflect the priorities of people affected by the disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of identifying research priorities in consultation groups.

References

    1. Aspinal F, Hughes R, Dunckley M, Addington-Hall J (2006) What is important to measure in the last months and weeks of life. A modified nominal group study. Int J Nurs Stud 43: 393–403 - PubMed
    1. Campbell SM, Cantrill JA (2001) Consensus methods in prescribing research. J Clin Pharm Ther 26: 5–14 - PubMed
    1. Corner J, Wright D (2004) Involving people affected by cancer in setting priorities for cancer research. Report to Macmillan Cancer Relief 1–44
    1. Department of Health (2004) Choosing Health: Making Healthy Choices Easier. Department of Health: London
    1. Department of Health (2005) Research Governance Framework: 2nd edn., Department of Health: London

Publication types