MR imaging in high-risk obstetric patients: a valuable complement to US
- PMID: 1734485
- DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.12.1.1734485
MR imaging in high-risk obstetric patients: a valuable complement to US
Abstract
The accuracy of prenatal diagnosis has become increasingly critical in the field of high-risk obstetrics. Although ultrasound (US) provides adequate information in most cases and continues to be the initial prenatal examination of choice, there are instances in which the results of the US study may be equivocal. The role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was explored in 27 selected patients with various indications to determine its effectiveness as a complement to US. MR imaging was most helpful in the diagnosis of extrauterine gestation, evaluation of placental position, determination of extent or nature of masses associated with pregnancy, and differentiation between diaphragmatic hernia and a thoracic mass. Although MR imaging did not add information that affected the accuracy of the diagnosis of oligohydramnios, in all other cases it provided an extra dimension in diagnosis by showing clearer anatomic relationships in the pelvis. It has proved to be a valuable complement to an equivocal US study.
Similar articles
-
Sonographic diagnosis of advanced ectopic pregnancy. A case report.J Reprod Med. 1991 Nov;36(11):815-7. J Reprod Med. 1991. PMID: 1765961
-
[The role of ultrasonics as a method of diagnosis in obstetrics and gynecology].Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1974 Oct;94(10):767-92. Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1974. PMID: 4612670 French. No abstract available.
-
Pelvic masses in pregnant patients: MR and US imaging.Radiology. 1986 Jun;159(3):717-24. doi: 10.1148/radiology.159.3.3517956. Radiology. 1986. PMID: 3517956
-
MR imaging of maternal diseases of the abdomen and pelvis during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period.Radiographics. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):1301-16. doi: 10.1148/rg.245045036. Radiographics. 2004. PMID: 15371610 Review.
-
Ultrasound in pregnancy.Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004 Aug;22(3):697-722. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2004.04.005. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004. PMID: 15301847 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of prenatal and postnatal MRI findings in the evaluation of intrauterine CNS anomalies requiring postnatal neurosurgical treatment.Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Feb;24(2):185-92. doi: 10.1007/s00381-007-0452-0. Epub 2007 Aug 21. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008. PMID: 17710413
-
Mapping fetal brain development in utero using magnetic resonance imaging: the Big Bang of brain mapping.Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011 Aug 15;13:345-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124654. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011. PMID: 21568716 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pregnancy with Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Pilot Study.Dis Markers. 2019 Nov 16;2019:4373490. doi: 10.1155/2019/4373490. eCollection 2019. Dis Markers. 2019. PMID: 31827633 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology.Radiol Med. 2008 Mar;113(2):225-41. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0242-0. Epub 2008 Apr 2. Radiol Med. 2008. PMID: 18386124 English, Italian.
-
The usefulness of fetal MRI for prenatal diagnosis.Yonsei Med J. 2007 Aug 31;48(4):671-7. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.4.671. Yonsei Med J. 2007. PMID: 17722241 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical