ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 12: oocyte donation for non-reproductive purposes
- PMID: 17347168
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem025
ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 12: oocyte donation for non-reproductive purposes
Abstract
The present paper focuses on oocyte donation for non-reproductive purposes, i.e. research and future therapy. The general principles of research ethics apply to these interventions. The proportionality principle demands that any possible harms to the oocyte donors should be proportionate to the possible benefits for society. The non-maleficence principle states that every reasonable effort should be made to minimize risks for donors. The position is adopted that, mutatis mutandis, women who donate oocytes for research should be treated similarly to research participants in clinical trials. This implies, among other things, that oocyte donors for research should receive reimbursement for all costs of the procedure and should get compensation for the time lost and inconvenience suffered during the treatment. In order to avoid malpractice and exploitation of poor women, a number of measures are proposed such as a ban on the import of oocytes.
Similar articles
-
Oocyte donation for stem cell research.Hum Reprod. 2007 Mar;22(3):629-34. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del431. Epub 2006 Nov 1. Hum Reprod. 2007. PMID: 17079245
-
Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Mar;77(3):317-21. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998. PMID: 9539279
-
Ethics. Issues in oocyte donation for stem cell research.Science. 2005 Jun 17;308(5729):1747-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1114454. Epub 2005 May 19. Science. 2005. PMID: 15905363 No abstract available.
-
Oocyte donation for reproduction and research cloning--the perils of commodification and the need for European and international regulation.Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2006 Jul-Dec;(25):205-41. Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2006. PMID: 17393805 Review.
-
Risk information provided to prospective oocyte donors in a preliminary phone call.Am J Bioeth. 2001 Fall;1(4):3-13. doi: 10.1162/152651601317139207. Am J Bioeth. 2001. PMID: 11954633 Review.
Cited by
-
Eggs, ethics and exploitation? Investigating women's experiences of an egg sharing scheme.Sociol Health Illn. 2012 Nov;34(8):1199-214. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01467.x. Epub 2012 Mar 23. Sociol Health Illn. 2012. PMID: 22443419 Free PMC article.
-
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for mitochondrial DNA disorders: ethical guidance for clinical practice.Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Dec;17(12):1550-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.88. Epub 2009 May 27. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009. PMID: 19471315 Free PMC article.
-
Stem cell-derived gametes: what to expect when expecting their clinical introduction.Hum Reprod. 2025 Sep 1;40(9):1605-1615. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf123. Hum Reprod. 2025. PMID: 40605085 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Juggling on a rollercoaster? Gains, loss and uncertainties in IVF patients' accounts of volunteering for a U.K. 'egg sharing for research' scheme.Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jun;86:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Mar 13. Soc Sci Med. 2013. PMID: 23608093 Free PMC article.
-
LINE-1-Induced Retrotransposition Affects Early Preimplantation Embryo DNA Integrity and Pluripotency.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Nov 27;25(23):12722. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312722. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39684434 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources