Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging
- PMID: 17353441
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652016
Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging
Abstract
Background: Adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion (MRP) and dobutamine stress magnetic resonance (DSMR) wall motion analyses are highly accurate for the detection of myocardial ischemia. However, knowledge about the prognostic value of stress MR examinations is limited. We sought to determine the value of MRP and DSMR, as assessed during a single-session examination, in predicting the outcome of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
Methods and results: In 513 patients (with known or suspected coronary disease, prior coronary artery bypass graft, or percutaneous coronary intervention), a combined single-session magnetic resonance stress examination (MRP and DSMR) was performed at 1.5 T. For first-pass perfusion imaging, the standard adenosine stress imaging protocol (140 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 6 minutes, 3-slice turbo field echo-echo-planar imaging or steady-state free precession sequence, 0.05 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA) was applied, and for DSMR, the standard high-dose dobutamine/atropine protocol (steady-state free-precession cine sequence) was applied. Stress testing was classified as pathological if at MRP > or = 1 segment showed an inducible perfusion deficit > 25% transmurality or if at DSMR > or = 1 segment showed an inducible wall motion abnormality. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range, 0.06 to 4.55 years), 19 cardiac events occurred (4.1%; 9 cardiac deaths, 10 nonfatal myocardial infarctions). The 3-year event-free survival was 99.2% for patients with normal MRP and DSMR and 83.5% for those with abnormal MRP and DSMR. Univariate analysis showed ischemia identified by MRP and DSMR to be predictive of cardiac events (hazard ratio, 12.51; 95% confidence interval, 3.64 to 43.03; and hazard ratio, 5.42; 95% confidence interval, 2.18 to 13.50; P<0.001, respectively); other predictors were diabetes mellitus, known coronary artery disease, and the presence of resting wall motion abnormality. By multivariate analysis, ischemia on magnetic resonance stress testing (MRP or DSMR) was an independent predictor of cardiac events. In a stepwise multivariate model (Cox regression), an abnormal magnetic resonance stress test result had significant incremental value over clinical risk factors and resting wall motion abnormality (P<0.001).
Conclusions: In patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia detected by MRP and DSMR can be used to identify patients at high risk for subsequent cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. For patients with normal MRP and DSMR, the 3-year event-free survival was 99.2%. MR stress testing provides important incremental information over clinical risk factors and resting wall motion abnormalities.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion.Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):835-42. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138927.00357.FB. Epub 2004 Aug 2. Circulation. 2004. PMID: 15289384 Clinical Trial.
-
Dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients after invasive coronary revascularization with stent placement.Acta Radiol. 2009 Dec;50(10):1134-41. doi: 10.3109/02841850903216692. Acta Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19922310
-
Additional value of myocardial perfusion imaging during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance for the assessment of coronary artery disease.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Sep;1(2):122-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.779108. Epub 2008 Jul 30. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008. PMID: 19808529
-
The prognostic value of normal stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;6(4):574-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000035. Epub 2013 Jun 14. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23771988 Review.
-
[Stress cine MRI for detection of coronary artery disease].Rofo. 2002 May;174(5):605-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-28277. Rofo. 2002. PMID: 11997861 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Diagnosis and management of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children and adolescents.World J Transplant. 2014 Dec 24;4(4):276-93. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i4.276. World J Transplant. 2014. PMID: 25540736 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging provides effective cardiac risk reclassification in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.Circulation. 2013 Aug 6;128(6):605-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001430. Epub 2013 Jun 26. Circulation. 2013. PMID: 23804252 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial).J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Sep 2;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-61. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012. PMID: 22938651 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Usefulness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease].Wien Med Wochenschr. 2008;158(5-6):140-7. doi: 10.1007/s10354-008-0513-3. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2008. PMID: 18421554 Review. German.
-
Performance of adenosine "stress-only" perfusion MRI in patients without a history of myocardial infarction: a clinical outcome study.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;28(1):109-15. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9775-0. Epub 2011 Jan 30. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012. PMID: 21279694 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous