[Potential risk caused by the lack of recognition of coronary spasm: analysis of the coronary spasm questionnaire in Japan]

Abstract

Background: The spasm provocation test (SPT)is no longer widely used in patients with undiagnosed chest pain syndromes in the USA and Europe. Objectives. The clinical significance of the SPT was examined in Japan and compared with the frequency of coronary spastic angina (CSA) in institutions with and without SPT screening.

Methods and results: Questionnaires concerning the number of cases of coronary angiography (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and invasive/non-invasive SPT in 2005 were sent to members of the Japanese Circulation Society in 1,177 cardiology hospitals. Completed surveys were returned from 208 hospitals (17.7%). Non-invasive SPT was performed in only 27 hospitals (13.0%). Invasive SPT was not performed in 50 (24.0%) institutions, and performed in the remaining 158 institutions(< 10 cases/year: 29.8%, > or = 10< 50: 33.7%, > or = 50< 100: 8.7%, > or = 100: 3.8%). There was a close correlation between the number of acetylcholine/ergonovine SPTs and the number of CSA cases finally diagnosed (acetylcholine: r(2)= 0.907, ergonovine: r(2) = 0.76). There was no difference in the number/year of CAG (525+/-451 vs 513 +/-888, NS) and PCI(175+/-156 vs 144+/-225, NS) between institutions with and without SPT screening. However, the number of CSA cases (15.6+/-21.6 vs 4.2 +/-13.0, p < 0.01) and variant angina cases (3.3+/-7.2 vs 1.4+/-2.4)in hospitals with SPT screening was higher than hospitals without SPT screening.

Conclusions: If Japanese cardiologists discontinue use of the SPT as in the USA and Europe, occurrence of CSA may disappear in the near future in Japan.