A longitudinal observational study of preference for elective caesarean section among nulliparous Hong Kong Chinese women
- PMID: 17355362
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01267.x
A longitudinal observational study of preference for elective caesarean section among nulliparous Hong Kong Chinese women
Abstract
Objective: To establish whether women's preference for elective caesarean section (ELCS) changes as gestation advances.
Design: A prospective longitudinal observational study.
Setting: Two units providing obstetric care in Hong Kong, one public and one private.
Sample: Five hundred and one nulliparous Chinese pregnant women attending their routine fetal anomaly scan in either unit.
Methods: Consented subjects had two interviews using a structured questionnaire at 18-22 weeks and 35-37 weeks of gestation, respectively. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify determinants for preferring ELCS at the two gestational ages.
Main outcome measure: The preferences for the mode of delivery at the two gestational ages.
Results: The prevalence of maternal preference for ELCS in the study cohort was 17.2% (95% CI 13.9-20.5) and 12.7% (95% CI 9.6-15.8) at mid-trimester and at term, respectively. Significantly more women who preferred ELCS at mid-trimester changed to a trial of vaginal delivery (VD) at term than vice versa (42.0 versus 3.8%). The partner's preference for ELCS was a significant determinant for women preferring ELCS throughout the antenatal period. Among the women booked in the public sector, more women who preferred ELCS at term changed to deliver in private hospitals than those who preferred VD (46.2 versus 9.7%).
Conclusions: Many women changed from preferring ELCS to preferring VD as their pregnancy approached term. The partner's preference was a significant determinant for the women's choice. If a decrease in the proportion of women preferring ELCS is desired, the intervention programme should target the women and their partners who hold such a preference at 20 weeks.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.PLoS Med. 2018 Oct 16;15(10):e1002672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002672. eCollection 2018 Oct. PLoS Med. 2018. PMID: 30325928 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x. Birth. 2008. PMID: 18507583
-
Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?BJOG. 2006 Nov;113(11):1253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01069.x. Epub 2006 Oct 2. BJOG. 2006. PMID: 17014679
-
Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13. Midwifery. 2011. PMID: 20630634
-
Elective caesarean section and respiratory morbidity in the term and near-term neonate.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):389-94. doi: 10.1080/00016340601159256. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007. PMID: 17486457 Review.
Cited by
-
A bit of medical paternalism? A qualitative study on power relations between women and healthcare providers when deciding on mode of birth in five public maternity wards of Argentina.Reprod Health. 2023 Aug 21;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01661-5. Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 37605278 Free PMC article.
-
Cesarean section in Shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences?BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Aug 22;14:285. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-285. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 25148697 Free PMC article.
-
Women's preference for cesarean delivery and differences between Taiwanese women undergoing different modes of delivery.BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 26;10:138. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-138. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010. PMID: 20504354 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of China's Universal Two-child Policy on the Rate of Cesarean Delivery: A Case Study of a Big Childbirth Center in China.Curr Med Sci. 2020 Apr;40(2):348-353. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2190-4. Epub 2020 Apr 26. Curr Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32337696
-
Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.PLoS Med. 2018 Oct 16;15(10):e1002672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002672. eCollection 2018 Oct. PLoS Med. 2018. PMID: 30325928 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical