Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):201-18.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00607.x.

The boomers are coming: a total cost of care model of the impact of population aging on health care costs in the United States by Major Practice Category

Affiliations

The boomers are coming: a total cost of care model of the impact of population aging on health care costs in the United States by Major Practice Category

E Mary Martini et al. Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To project the impact of population aging on total U.S. health care per capita costs from 2000 to 2050 and for the range of clinical areas defined by Major Practice Categories (MPCs).

Data sources: Secondary data: HealthPartners health plan administrative data; U.S. Census Bureau population projections 2000-2050; and MEPS 2001 health care annual per capita costs.

Study design: We calculate MPC-specific age and gender per capita cost rates using cross-sectional data for 2002-2003 and project U.S. changes by MPC due to aging from 2000 to 2050.

Data collection methods: HealthPartners data were grouped using purchased software. We developed and validated a method to include pharmacy costs for the uncovered.

Principal findings: While total U.S. per capita costs due to aging from 2000 to 2050 are projected to increase 18 percent (0.3 percent annually), the impact by MPC ranges from a 55 percent increase in kidney disorders to a 12 percent decrease in pregnancy and infertility care. Over 80 percent of the increase in total per capita cost will result from just seven of the 22 total MPCs.

Conclusions: Understanding the differential impact of aging on costs at clinically specific levels is important for resource planning, to effectively address future medical needs of the aging U.S. population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standardized-Annualized per Capita Costs, 2002–2003, All Services
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardized-Annualized per Capita Costs, 2002–2003, Heart and Vascular Conditions
Figure 3
Figure 3
Standardized-Annualized per Capita Costs, 2002–2003, Kidney Disorders
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative Percent Change in Health Care per Capita Costs Due to Aging, United States 2000–2050

References

    1. Alemayehu B, Warner KE. The Lifetime Distribution of Health Care Costs. Health Services Research. 2004;39(3):627–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson LH, Martinson BC, Crain AL, Pronk NP, Whitebird RR, O'Connor PJ, Fine LJ. 2005. “Health Care Charges Associated with Physical Inactivity, Overweight, and Obesity” [accessed on October 4, 2005]. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/oct/04_0118.htm. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biles B, Nicholas LH, Cooper B. The Cost of Privatization: Extra Payments to Medicare Advantage Plans—2005 Update. Issue Brief (Commonwealth Fund) 2004;(750):1–12. - PubMed
    1. Burner ST, Waldo DR, McKusick DR. National Health Expenditures Projections Through 2030. Health Care Financing Review. 1992;14(1):1–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2001. “Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey” [accessed on October 4, 2005]. Available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MCBS/PubCNP01.asp.

Publication types

MeSH terms