Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;26(6):858-63.
doi: 10.1002/nau.20407.

Test-retest reliability of an instrumented speculum for measuring vaginal closure force

Affiliations

Test-retest reliability of an instrumented speculum for measuring vaginal closure force

J M Miller et al. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007.

Abstract

Aims: The study aimed to: a) determine reliability of an instrumented speculum designed for measuring intravaginal closure pressure, and b) compare findings with a comparable device reported in the literature. The goal of these new devices is to reduce subjectivity, improve precision, and acknowledge reliability issues in quantifying levator ani closure force acting on the vagina.

Methods: The instrumented speculum consisted of two parallel aluminum bills, similar in size to a Peterson speculum. Strain gages located near the root of each bill measure the magnitude of force exerted in the distal vagina. A contraction of the "U-shaped" levator ani muscle closes the levator hiatus with resultant reaction force measured by the speculum in the mid-sagittal plane. We tested the device in twelve nulliparous women making repeated measures within and across 3 different visit days. All measures were made by the same investigator.

Results: Same day measures were repeatable within +/-3.8 N by the third visit, with lesser repeatability on the 1st and 2nd visit days. Across days, repeatability was improved by Visits 2 and 3 with a coefficient of repeatability between those days of +/-5.5 N. Better repeatability was obtained using averaged scores rather than 'best effort' ; but average scores can underestimate best effort.

Conclusion: Reasonable within-visit repeatability was found. Across-visit repeatability is consistent with the known difficulty that women have in maximally isolating and activating their levator ani muscles. The results corroborate the repeatability results of Dumoulin et al. [2004] using a similar type of dynamometer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Photograph showing the device and how it was held between the tips of the thumb and first two fingers for the measurements. The strain gages are covered with a white silicone sealant to protect them from moisture. The vertical line in the background illustrates the 5 cm depth to which the bills were inserted. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Plots of the differences between repeated intravaginal closure force measures obtained in newtons (N) during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) maneuvers on Visit 1, Visit 2, and Visit 3. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DeLancey JOL. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: The hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1713–23. - PubMed
    1. Miller JM, Perucchini D, Carchidi LT, et al. Pelvic muscle contraction during a cough and decreased vesical neck mobility. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:255–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shafik A, Doss S, Asaad S. Etiology of the resting myoelectric activity of the levator ani muscle: Physioanatomic study with a new theory. World J Surg. 2003;27:309–14. - PubMed
    1. Morgan DM, Kaur G, Hsu Y, et al. Does vaginal closure force differ in the supine and standing positions? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1722–8. - PubMed
    1. Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, Hsu Y, et al. Interaction among apical support, levator ani impairment, and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2006a;108:324–32. - PMC - PubMed