Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar 6;104(10):4014-9.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611058104. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy

Affiliations

Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy

Albert Cerussi et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Diffuse optical spectroscopy (DOS) and imaging are emerging diagnostic techniques that quantitatively measure the concentration of deoxy-hemoglobin (ctHHb), oxy-hemoglobin (ctO(2)Hb), water (ctH(2)O), and lipid in cm-thick tissues. In early-stage clinical studies, diffuse optical imaging and DOS have been used to characterize breast tumor biochemical composition and monitor therapeutic response in stage II/III neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients. We investigated whether DOS measurements obtained before and 1 week into a 3-month adriamycin/cytoxan neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen can predict final, postsurgical pathological response. Baseline DOS measurements of 11 patients before therapy revealed significant increases in tumor ctHHb, ctO(2)Hb, ctH(2)O, and spectral scattering slope, and decreases in bulk lipids, relative to normal breast tissue. Tumor concentrations of ctHHb, ctO(2)Hb, and ctH(2)O dropped 27 +/- 15%, 33 +/- 7%, and 11 +/- 15%, respectively, within 1 week (6.5 +/- 1.4 days) of the first treatment for pathology-confirmed responders (n = 6), whereas nonresponders (n = 5) and normal side controls showed no significant changes in these parameters. The best single predictor of therapeutic response 1 week posttreatment was ctHHb (83% sensitivity, 100% specificity), while discrimination analysis based on combined ctHHb and ctH(2)O changes classified responders vs. nonresponders with 100% sensitivity and specificity. In addition, the pretreatment tumor-to-normal ctO(2)Hb ratio was significantly higher in responders (2.82 +/- 0.44) vs. nonresponders (1.82 +/- 0.49). These results highlight DOS sensitivity to tumor cellular metabolism and biochemical composition and demonstrate its potential for predicting and monitoring an individual's response to treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: One patent has been issued and another is pending for the DOS technology developed by A.C. and B.J.T. and described in this work.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Typical DOS measurement geometry, defining the optical linescan taken over a known tumor location. Complete NIR absorption and scattering spectra were measured at each location.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
NIR absorption (Left) and reduced scattering (Right) spectra obtained noninvasively from a 30-mm diameter tumor in the breast of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy subject. (Left) The heightened absorption results from a combination of increased hemoglobin and water relative to normal breast tissue. (Right) The sharp spectral decrease in scattering for tumor tissue is likely due to increases in both cellular density and fibrous tissue in tumor tissue relative to normal breast tissue. Tumor spectra were obtained from the +10-mm position, whereas the normal spectra were taken from the corresponding contralateral position on the normal side. Error bars are the variation from two independent linescans (plotted every 50 nm for clarity).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Linescan results of ctH2O (Upper) and ctHHb (Lower) from the same patient as in Fig. 2. NIR spectra at each linescan location are used to calculate NIR absorber concentrations at each spatial location. Error bars are the variations between two independent linescans.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Plots of changes in tumor ctHHb, ctO2Hb, ctH2O, and stO2 for individual patients, stratified by final pathological response. The plotted value is the average of the DOS parameter within the FWHM. The baseline and ∼1 week points correspond to the measurements taken within 1 week before and within 1 week after the start of therapy, respectively. Responder changes are distinctive from nonresponders. Error bars for the individual measurements are not presented for clarity (5–10%).

References

    1. Carlson RW, Favret AM. Breast J. 1999;5:303–307. - PubMed
    1. Mankoff DA, Dunnwald LK, Gralow JR, Ellis GK, Drucker MJ, Livingston RB. Cancer. 1999;85:2410–2423. - PubMed
    1. Esteva FJ, Hortobagyi GN. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1999;13:457–472. vii. - PubMed
    1. Hortobagyi GN. Cancer. 1990;66:1387–1391. - PubMed
    1. De Lena M, Varini M, Zucali R, Rovini D, Viganotti G, Valagussa P, Veronesi U, Bonadonna G. Cancer Clin Trials. 1981;4:229–236. - PubMed

Publication types