Promotion of attendance for mammographic screening through general practice: a randomised trial of two strategies
- PMID: 1736084
Promotion of attendance for mammographic screening through general practice: a randomised trial of two strategies
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of two strategies--patient education and practitioner recommendation--in encouraging women to attend for mammographic screening.
Design: The study was a prospective randomised controlled trial. Women aged between 40 and 70 years attending a general practitioner participated in the study. Consenting, eligible women were randomly allocated to one of the two strategy groups.
Setting: The study was conducted in private general practice in Newcastle, New South Wales.
Participants: The general practitioners who took part in the study were a non-random sample of practitioners: 20 were approached, two declined to participate, and five failed to begin recruitment, leaving 13 practitioners who took part in the study. A total of 302 women aged 40-69 were recorded as attending the surgeries during recruitment sessions. Twenty women did not consent to the study and 73 were ineligible. Thirty-four women were not given the intervention because the general practitioner forgot or did not have time. There were 92 women in the simple recommendation group and 83 women in the patient education group.
Interventions: An intensive patient education approach based on health belief principles was compared with a simple recommendation by the general practitioner that the woman have a mammogram.
Main outcome measure: Attendance rates were calculated from screening service attendance records.
Results: No significant difference in attendance rates was observed between the two groups, 82% of the simple recommendation group and 91% of the patient education group attended for screening.
Conclusions: These results suggest that mammographic screening can be effectively promoted in general practice without extensive patient education.
Similar articles
-
[The health project Ebeltoft: health check ups and discussions in general practice. Basic data from a 5-year, prospective, randomized, controlled population study].Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Jun 16;159(25):3940-6. Ugeskr Laeger. 1997. PMID: 9214067 Clinical Trial. Danish.
-
Ebeltoft project: baseline data from a five-year randomized, controlled, prospective health promotion study in a Danish population.Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Oct;45(399):542-7. Br J Gen Pract. 1995. PMID: 7492424 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Can systematic general health screening and patient-physician health discussions improve the cardiovascular profile of the population? A randomized controlled trial in general practice with a 5-year follow-up].Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jun 17;164(25):3354-60. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002. PMID: 12107951 Clinical Trial. Danish.
-
Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Mar;59(3):198-204. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.021584. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005. PMID: 15709078 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hypercholesterolaemia: setting a Dutch national standard.Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Oct;42(363):411-4. Br J Gen Pract. 1992. PMID: 1466918 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Screening and self examination for breast cancer.BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):168-74. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.168. BMJ. 1994. PMID: 8044097 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 11;9(9):CD012472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30204235 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical