Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2007 Sep;18(9):1177-87.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0319-3. Epub 2007 Mar 15.

Performance of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool in ruling out low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Performance of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool in ruling out low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a systematic review

B Rud et al. Osteoporos Int. 2007 Sep.

Erratum in

  • Osteoporos Int. 2007 Sep;18(9):1307

Abstract

The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST) is a simple test that may be of clinical value to rule-out low bone mineral density. We performed a systematic review to assess its performance in postmenopausal women. We included 36 studies. OST performed moderately in ruling-out femoral neck T-score <or= -2.5, but poorly in ruling-out lumbar spine T-score <or= -2.5. Methodological study quality was generally low.

Introduction: The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST) is a simple clinical decision rule based on age and weight that may be of clinical value to rule-out low bone mineral density (BMD). Our aim was to systematically assess the performance of OST in postmenopausal women.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, citation lists and conference proceedings for studies evaluating OST using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as reference test to measure BMD. We evaluated methodological quality using the QUADAS checklist. Our main outcome was the likelihood ratio of a negative OST result (LR-).

Results: OST performed moderately in ruling-out femoral neck T-score <or= -2.5 in whites, summary LR- (sLR-) 0.19 (95% CI, 0.17-0.21) and between-study heterogeneity was low (I(2) = 7%). The corresponding performance in Asians was similar, sLR- 0.19 (0.14-0.28), but there was considerable heterogeneity (I(2) = 64%). OST performed poorly in ruling-out lumbar spine T-score <or= -2.5 in whites and Asians, sLR- 0.43 (0.31-0.59) and 0.32 (0.28-0.38), respectively. The performance in ruling-out T-score <or= -2.0 in whites was poor regardless of region (sLR- >or=0.28). Methodological study quality was generally low.

Conclusions: The clinical usefulness of OST is uncertain. OST could be useful for ruling-out femoral neck T-score <or= -2.5, but confirmatory high-quality studies are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Individualization of osteoporosis risk.
    Nguyen TV. Nguyen TV. Osteoporos Int. 2007 Sep;18(9):1153-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0415-z. Epub 2007 Jul 5. Osteoporos Int. 2007. PMID: 17611705 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(4):390-406 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2004 Jun 15;23(11):1663-82 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1999 Aug 18;282(7):637-45 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1755-60 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2002 Jun 1;359(9321):1929-36 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources