The effects of arm crank strategy on physiological responses and mechanical efficiency during submaximal exercise
- PMID: 17365532
- DOI: 10.1080/02640410600702883
The effects of arm crank strategy on physiological responses and mechanical efficiency during submaximal exercise
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare submaximal physiological responses and indices of mechanical efficiency between asynchronous and synchronous arm ergometry. Thirteen wheelchair-dependent trained athletes performed eight steady-state incremental bouts of exercise (0 to 140 W), each lasting 4 min, using synchronous and asynchronous arm-cranking strategies. Physiological measures included oxygen uptake (VO2), heart rate, and blood lactate concentration. The power outputs corresponding to fixed whole blood lactate concentrations of 2.0 to 4.0 mmol x l(-1) were calculated using linear interpolation. Mechanical efficiency indices - gross efficiency, net efficiency, and work efficiency - were also calculated. An analysis of variance with repeated measures was applied to determine the effect of crank mode on the physiological parameters. Oxygen uptake was on average 10% lower (P < 0.01), and both net efficiency (P < 0.01) and gross efficiency (P < 0.01) were higher, during the asynchronous strategy at both 60 and 80 W (gross efficiency: 16.9 +/- 2.0% vs. 14.7 +/- 2.4% and 17.5 +/- 1.8% vs. 15.9 +/- 2.6% at 60 and 80 W respectively). There were no differences in heart rate, blood lactate concentration or power output at either of the blood lactate reference points between the asynchronous and synchronous strategies (P > 0.05). In conclusion, test specificity is an important consideration. If a synchronous strategy is to be adopted, it is likely to result in lower efficiency than an asynchronous strategy. The exercise testing scenario may help dictate which method is ultimately chosen.
Similar articles
-
A physiological comparison of synchronous and asynchronous hand cycling.Int J Sports Med. 2004 Nov;25(8):622-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-817879. Int J Sports Med. 2004. PMID: 15532007
-
The effect of crank rate strategy on peak aerobic power and peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry.J Sports Sci. 2007 Apr;25(6):711-8. doi: 10.1080/02640410600831955. J Sports Sci. 2007. PMID: 17454538
-
The effect of crank rate on physiological responses and exercise efficiency using a range of submaximal workloads during arm crank ergometry.Int J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;27(3):199-204. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-837620. Int J Sports Med. 2006. PMID: 16541375
-
The influence of crank configuration on muscle activity and torque production during arm crank ergometry.J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Aug;18(4):598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Mar 6. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008. PMID: 17337211
-
Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry.Spinal Cord. 1999 Aug;37(8):569-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100875. Spinal Cord. 1999. PMID: 10455533 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
The influence of crank length and cadence on mechanical efficiency in hand cycling.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jan;102(2):189-94. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0576-7. Epub 2007 Oct 2. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008. PMID: 17909841
-
Steering Does Affect Biophysical Responses in Asynchronous, but Not Synchronous Submaximal Handcycle Ergometry in Able-Bodied Men.Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Oct 25;3:741258. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.741258. eCollection 2021. Front Sports Act Living. 2021. PMID: 34761216 Free PMC article.
-
Changing relative crank angle increases the metabolic cost of leg cycling.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Oct;117(10):2021-2027. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3691-0. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28785797
-
Effect of Three Different Grip Angles on Physiological Parameters During Laboratory Handcycling Test in Able-Bodied Participants.Front Physiol. 2015 Nov 23;6:331. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00331. eCollection 2015. Front Physiol. 2015. PMID: 26635617 Free PMC article.
-
The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Sep;112(9):3431-7. doi: 10.1007/s00421-012-2324-x. Epub 2012 Jan 26. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012. PMID: 22278391 Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources