Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey
- PMID: 17366184
- DOI: 10.1080/15265160601109085
Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey
Abstract
Context: Although ethics consultation is commonplace in United States (U.S.) hospitals, descriptive data about this health service are lacking.
Objective: To describe the prevalence, practitioners, and processes of ethics consultation in U.S. hospitals.
Design: A 56-item phone or questionnaire survey of the "best informant" within each hospital.
Participants: Random sample of 600 U.S. general hospitals, stratified by bed size.
Results: The response rate was 87.4%. Ethics consultation services (ECSs) were found in 81% of all general hospitals in the U.S., and in 100% of hospitals with more than 400 beds. The median number of consults performed by ECSs in the year prior to survey was 3. Most individuals performing ethics consultation were physicians (34%), nurses (31%), social workers (11%), or chaplains (10%). Only 41% had formal supervised training in ethics consultation. Consultation practices varied widely both within and between ECSs. For example, 65% of ECSs always made recommendations, whereas 6% never did. These findings highlight a need to clarify standards for ethics consultation practices.
Comment in
-
A better way to evaluate clinical ethics consultations? An ecological approach.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):26-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109127. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366185 No abstract available.
-
A comment on community consultation.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):29-31. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109184. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366186 No abstract available.
-
The failure of the consult model: why "mediation" should replace "consultation".Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):31-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109234. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366187 No abstract available.
-
Pride and prejudice: how might ethics consultation services minimize bias?Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):32-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109317. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366188 No abstract available.
-
Credentialing ethics consultants: an invitation to collaboration.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):35-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109366. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366189 No abstract available.
-
Failure to thrive: can education save the life of ethics consultation?Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):37-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109416. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366190 No abstract available.
-
Education to dispel the myth.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):39-40. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109432. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366191 No abstract available.
-
Ethics consultation: whose ethics?Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):41-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109473. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366192 No abstract available.
-
The goals of ethics consultation: rejecting the role of "ethics police".Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):42-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109515. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366193 No abstract available.
-
The war on error.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):44-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109614. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366194 No abstract available.
-
Different questions, different goals.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):46-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109622. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366195 No abstract available.
-
Additional implications of a national survey on ethics consultation in United States hospitals.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):47-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109630. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366196 No abstract available.
-
Who's guarding the henhouse? Ramifications of the Fox study.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109648. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366197 No abstract available.