Comment
doi: 10.1080/15265160601111859.
Evaluation of research design by research ethics committees: misleading reassurance and the need for substantive reforms
Affiliations
- PMID: 17366208
- DOI: 10.1080/15265160601111859
Item in Clipboard
Comment
Evaluation of research design by research ethics committees: misleading reassurance and the need for substantive reforms
Am J Bioeth.
2007 Feb.
No abstract available
Comment on
-
Money and distorted ethical judgments about research: ethical assessment of the TeGenero TGN1412 trial.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):76-81. doi: 10.1080/15265160601111800. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366206 Review.
Similar articles
-
Ethical flaws in the TeGenero trial.Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):90-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160601112204. Am J Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 17366211 No abstract available.
-
IRB reform.N Engl J Med. 2002 May 2;346(18):1402-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200205023461813. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 11986417 No abstract available.
-
Resource and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: preparations for HIV vaccine trials.IRB. 2006 Mar-Apr;28(2):1-9. IRB. 2006. PMID: 16770882 No abstract available.
-
[Ethics of observational studies: are specific rules useful?].Epidemiol Prev. 2006 Jul-Oct;30(4-5):295-7. Epidemiol Prev. 2006. PMID: 17176945 Review. Italian. No abstract available.
-
Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.J Health Care Law Policy. 2005;8(2):264-330. J Health Care Law Policy. 2005. PMID: 16471026 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical