Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;115(1):5-12.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.9456.

Ethical and scientific issues of nanotechnology in the workplace

Affiliations

Ethical and scientific issues of nanotechnology in the workplace

Paul A Schulte et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

In the absence of scientific clarity about the potential health effects of occupational exposure to nanoparticles, a need exists for guidance in decisionmaking about hazards, risks, and controls. An identification of the ethical issues involved may be useful to decision makers, particularly employers, workers, investors, and health authorities. Because the goal of occupational safety and health is the prevention of disease in workers, the situations that have ethical implications that most affect workers have been identified. These situations include the a) identification and communication of hazards and risks by scientists, authorities, and employers; b) workers' acceptance of risk; c) selection and implementation of controls; d) establishment of medical screening programs; and e) investment in toxicologic and control research. The ethical issues involve the unbiased determination of hazards and risks, nonmaleficence (doing no harm), autonomy, justice, privacy, and promoting respect for persons. As the ethical issues are identified and explored, options for decision makers can be developed. Additionally, societal deliberations about workplace risks of nanotechnologies may be enhanced by special emphasis on small businesses and adoption of a global perspective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Risk management decisionmaking for nanoparticles in the workplace: what is the appropriate level of controls?

References

    1. ACGIH
    1. Aitken RJ, Creely KS, Tran CL. 2004. Nanoparticles: An Occupational Hygiene Review. Health Safety Executive, Research Report 274. London:HSE Books.
    1. Ashford NA, Spadafor CJ, Hattis DB, Caldart CC. 1990. Monitoring the Worker for Exposure and Disease: Scientific Legal and Ethical Considerations in the Use of Biomarkers. Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    1. American Society for Testing and Materials. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/DATABASE.CART/WORKITEMS/WK8051....
    1. Bartis JT, Landree E. 2006. Nanomaterials in the Workplace: Policy and Planning Workshop on Occupational Safety and Health. Arlington, VA:RAND Corporation.

LinkOut - more resources