Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar 16;3(3):e53.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030053. Epub 2007 Feb 1.

(A)symmetric stem cell replication and cancer

Affiliations

(A)symmetric stem cell replication and cancer

David Dingli et al. PLoS Comput Biol. .

Erratum in

  • PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Apr;3(4):e83. Michor, Fransizka [corrected to Michor, Franziska]

Abstract

Most tissues in metazoans undergo continuous turnover due to cell death or epithelial shedding. Since cellular replication is associated with an inherent risk of mutagenesis, tissues are maintained by a small group of stem cells (SCs) that replicate slowly to maintain their own population and that give rise to differentiated cells. There is increasing evidence that many tumors are also maintained by a small population of cancer stem cells that may arise by mutations from normal SCs. SC replication can be either symmetric or asymmetric. The former can lead to expansion of the SC pool. We describe a simple model to evaluate the impact of (a)symmetric SC replication on the expansion of mutant SCs and to show that mutations that increase the probability of asymmetric replication can lead to rapid mutant SC expansion in the absence of a selective fitness advantage. Mutations in several genes can lead to this process and may be at the root of the carcinogenic process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. SC Replication Can Give Rise to Daughter Cells That Retain the Properties of the SCs or Become Committed to Differentiate
If the two daughter cells share the same fate, the preceding division is considered to be symmetric; while if one daughter cell retains SC capabilities and the other differentiates, the preceding mitotic event is considered to be asymmetric. Normal SCs are in blue and differentiated cells are depicted in red.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Representation of the Stochastic Model of Mitotic SC Replication
The model is based on the Moran process, which maintains a constant population size (A) and in which cells are chosen for reproduction proportional to their fitness. (B) Normal (blue) and mutant (red) SCs may divide asymmetrically with probability p, while they divide symmetrically with probability q to produce two differentiated cells. SCs also can divide symmetrically to produce two daughter SCs with probability 1 − pq.
Figure 3
Figure 3. SC Dynamics
(A) In the absence of mutant SCs, normal SC homeostasis is maintained in the stochastic process, and the abundance of normal SCs, n = 1,000, remains constant. Transition probabilities are pb = qb = 1/3. (B) If a neutral mutant SC appears (i.e., a cell with the same reproductive fitness as a normal SC), random drift may allow the population to expand and take over the SC compartment (red) (pa = pb = qa = qb = 1/3, a 0 = 1, b0 = 999, r = 1, averaged over 1,000 runs and the percentage plotted). As the probability for self-renewal of the mutant SC increases, a higher fraction of compartments are taken over by the mutant SC (green, pa = qa = 0.3; magenta, pa = qa = 0.25; black, pa = qa = 0.2; blue, pa = qa = 0.1; yellow, pa = qa = 0). (C) A mutation that increases both the probability of self-renewal and the fitness is fixed in a large fraction of runs (red, pa = pb = 0.25, qa = qb = 1/3, a 0 = 1, b0 = 999, r = 1.1; blue, pa = pb = 0.15, r = 1.3 averaged over 1,000 runs and the percentage plotted).
Figure 4
Figure 4. The Impact of Compartment Size n on the Average Time to Fixation of a Mutant Cell Based on Equation 9
(A) As the compartment size increases, the average time to fixation increases. Parameter values are n = 10 (black), n = 50 (red), n = 100 (green), n = 200 (blue), and n = 1,000 (cyan). For all curves pa = qa = 0.25; pb = qb = 1/3; r = 1.02. (B) The reproductive fitness of the mutant SCs compared with the normal SC pool plays a determining role in the evolutionary trajectory of the mutant population. A mutant with a low reproductive fitness (black) (pa = pb = 0.3; qa = qb = 1/3, r = 0.8, n = 1,000) has a low prevalence in the population, while the prevalence increases as the fitness increases (red, r = 1.0; green, r = 1.2; blue, r = 1.4; cyan, r = 1.6; yellow, r = 1.8). If the mutant cells have a higher fitness and increased probability for self-renewal, the probability of fixation is even higher. Each result is the summary of 1,000 simulations and the percentage plotted.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Average Fixation Time of Mutant SC
The average fixation time of mutant SC depends on the relative fitness (A) (red, r = 1.02; blue, r = 1.05), population size (B), and probability of self-renewal (C) (Equation 9). The fixation time for a neutral mutant is always the longest. Although mutants with reduced fitness can reach fixation quickly, this is an improbable event. In all figures, n = 10 (red), n = 50 (green), n = 100 (blue), and n = 400 (black).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Araten DJ, Golde DW, Zhang RH, Thaler HT, Gargiulo L, et al. A quantitative measurement of the human somatic mutation rate. Cancer Res. 2005;65:8111–8117. - PubMed
    1. Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Cancer genes and the pathways they control. Nat Med. 2004;10:789–799. - PubMed
    1. Nowak MA, Michor F, Iwasa Y. The linear process of somatic evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:14966–14969. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michor F, Frank SA, May RM, Iwasa Y, Nowak MA. Somatic selection for and against cancer. J Theor Biol. 2003;225:377–382. - PubMed
    1. Wodarz D. Effect of stem cell turnover rates on protection against cancer and aging. J Theor Biol. 2006. E-pub 21 October 2006. - PubMed