A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction
- PMID: 17368026
- DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.009
A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction
Abstract
Method: The cosmetic and psychological outcomes of patients who underwent reconstructive surgery, conservative surgery or simple mastectomy for breast cancer between 1995 and 2002 were compared.
Results: There was a significant correlation between good psychological adjustment and good cosmetic outcome scores (p=0.01-0.05). There was no difference in cosmetic outcome between different reconstruction methods. Reconstruction patients rated their cosmetic outcome better than conservative surgery patients, and conservative surgery patients better than mastectomy patients. There were no differences in psychological outcome between patient groups.
Conclusion: Good perception of cosmetic outcome is associated with good psychological adjustment. There is no cosmetic advantage of one type of reconstruction over another. Reconstruction patients have a better body image compared with other treatment groups but there are no other psychological advantages of one type of treatment over another.
Similar articles
-
Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast.Surgery. 2008 Mar;143(3):414-25. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.10.006. Epub 2007 Dec 21. Surgery. 2008. PMID: 18291263
-
Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies.ANZ J Surg. 2005 Nov;75(11):940-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03517.x. ANZ J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16336382
-
Quality of life and satisfaction after breast cancer operation.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Jul;282(1):75-82. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1302-y. Epub 2009 Dec 4. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010. PMID: 19960349
-
Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Oct;31(8):817-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.05.010. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16043322 Review.
-
Conservative and radical oncoplastic approches in the surgical treatment of breast cancer.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2008 Nov-Dec;12(6):387-96. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2008. PMID: 19146201 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review.Gland Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):441-451. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.07.02. Gland Surg. 2019. PMID: 31538070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Positive and negative aspects of well-being as correlates of breast reconstruction decision.Qual Life Res. 2014 Aug;23(6):1803-12. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0612-5. Epub 2013 Dec 29. Qual Life Res. 2014. PMID: 24375190
-
In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast.Cancer Control. 2017 Oct-Dec;24(4):1073274817729064. doi: 10.1177/1073274817729064. Cancer Control. 2017. PMID: 28975840 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Preoperative Health-Related Quality of Life between Women Receiving Mastectomy or Breast Conserving Surgery in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.Curr Oncol. 2022 Dec 22;30(1):118-129. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010010. Curr Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36661659 Free PMC article.
-
Decision-Making in the Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer: Factors Influencing Women's Choices for Mastectomy and Breast Conserving Surgery.Front Oncol. 2016 Mar 29;6:74. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00074. eCollection 2016. Front Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27066455 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical